dcsapak's latest activity
-
dcsapak replied to the thread I have a 6-port Intel I226-V machine. After upgrading from Proxmox VE 8.4 to 9.1, two network ports disappeared from the system (enp5s0 and enp7s0)..can you post the full output of dmesg? that may reveal some more information what is happening here -
dcsapak replied to the thread Script for monitor ZFS Usage.mhmm to find that out, could you please post the output of zpool list zfs list cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg
-
dcsapak replied to the thread ifreload -a and frr error in Proxmox VE 8.this signal (11) is a "SIGSEGV" which means there was a segmentation fault somewhere. I'd guess it's either some corrupted file (you could check this with the 'debsums' package+command) or faulty hardware (like e.g. faulty memory) since it...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread BUG: move disk gives OK with errors.setting the '+i' (immutable) flag is only a further protecting layer. It's set to prevent accidental modification of template base file (since it could have linked clones). everything should continue to work even without that flag, but now an...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread PDM Usage bars are not usable.i agree it's not optimal. If you have a (in the best case concrete) improvement suggestion, please open an enhancement request on https://bugzilla.proxmox.com . that way we can better keep track of these requests :)
-
dcsapak replied to the thread PDM Usage bars are not usable.this is meant as a bar over time (left is older, right is newer) where the color indicates the usage (100% red, 0% green). I agree it's not the best visualization, but nothing better did come up yet. e.g. see the example screenshot in the docs...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread GPU passthrough to Container (LXC).mhmm? not sure i get what you mean. which documentation is "behind fake walled gardens" ? every piece of the software and docs are out in the open. Yes, we don't have any detailed guide ourselves on e.g. how you to run jellyfin with a gpu...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Network migration fail with "failed to parse api response" in network selection.this seems suspicious, can you post the /etc/network/interfaces of the host that returns that?
-
dcsapak replied to the thread On Limitations and Maximums.there are no artifical limits in pdm itself, so the only limit is what the system can give. mostly this is * network latency/throughput (e.g. for remotes with many vms updating the metrics, etc. can be quite large) * memory: from what i can...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Maintenance status not showed and no migration tasks are listed.while migration tasks should show on the pdm, i can confirm that the maintenance status of nodes is currently not shown on PDM Would you mind opening a feature request/bug on https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/ ?
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Mismatch Temperatures.sadly that path alone does not really say where it comes from or anything else. can you see which device (e.g. pci id) id belongs to? what does it show? you can print it by doing, e.g. cat /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon1/temp1_input
-
DNS, it's always DNS! Thank you! The IP entry was around the wrong way on the DNS server.
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Is it worth "Upgrading" to a B50pro from a 12gb A2000 ?.yes, it should be the same as passing through any other gpu note that passing through integrated gpus is a bit more complicated usually, and not as well supported as passing through "proper" pci devices.
-
dcsapak replied to the thread DCM Storage Selector Oddity.how does your remote config on the pdm look like? is it possible that the nodename <-> ip address mapping is wrong there? (that would explain it)
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Mismatch Temperatures.i guess sometimes the sensors that are available in linux via drivers/etc are not the same that are available via the ipmi so it might be a different sensor. do you know how beszel retrieves the sensor info? if the package 'lm-sensors' is...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Is it worth "Upgrading" to a B50pro from a 12gb A2000 ?.well, sr-iov is the 'pci standard' way to do multiple vgpus on a single pci card. nvidia takes a slightly different approach (you have to "activate" a profile on the virtual function and need a specialized driver) for normal passthrough, nothing...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Wie geht man bei Verwendung von vGPU vor, um bestimmte Komponenten nicht zu aktualisieren?.nur um ein bisschen Klarheit zu schaffen (die Doku page kann man hier sicher noch verbessern!): grundsätzlich sind die angegebenen Versionen miteinander kompatibel weil explizit getestet, bzw. beim expliziten durchtesten von neuen NVIDIA Treiber...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread Is it worth "Upgrading" to a B50pro from a 12gb A2000 ?.i can't really speak to the performance of each card (maybe there is some relevant benchmark for you out there) but theoretically the b50 can do sr-iov (so "vGPU") while the a2000 can't do that. if that's relevant to you it might be an upgrade...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread DGX B300 GPU passthrough on Proxmox: PCI device visible but NVIDIA driver cannot initialize.ok so because i also ran into a similar issue with an RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell card. if the host has one region with X GiB + several others , the MMIO size must be the next multiple of 2 above X so in your case, the host reports: which would...
-
dcsapak replied to the thread DGX B300 GPU passthrough on Proxmox: PCI device visible but NVIDIA driver cannot initialize.Hi, you say increasing the mmio size did not do anything: how did you do increase the size? did you see the different solutions to increasing the mmio size here...
