Recent content by daviditty

I'm aware of that, but that would mean a lot of work when creating a new vlan for a customer, as I'd not only have to configure the switches, I would also have to configure all hosts that will use it. However, as far as I see it works fine, with the command: bridge vlan show vmbrX I see all...

@iffster solved issues as in, all is working fine and we can ignore this message? mlx5e_vport_context_update_vlans:186:(pid 1448): netdev vlans list size (4095) > (512) max vport list size, some vlans will be dropped I'm fine with not using more than 512 vlans per host, the message gives me...

May I ask what kind of downtime you experienced? My guess would be with the Ceph MDS? It is the only thing different from the earlier posts, we didn't use them, only RBD. Also, nice addition I think, didn't know it was possible to add a "double" ring.

Is the used version ZFS 2.2.0 also affected by this? https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526#issuecomment-1823737998

I just did this in our production environment too, and it worked perfectly with your addition @cetjunior :-) I want to add to this that if you do this in the future, you only have to adjust the public_network or cluster_network under "global" in /etc/pve/ceph.conf, don't worry about all the...

Cool! Glad that you sorted it out, I still have to change it in production as we're sorting our network out first :)

@t.lamprecht I created a enhancement request as the user hasn't been seen on the forum since May 2022. I hope I included enough details without being too specific. https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4493 If you have any questions or improvements please let me know :)

Agreed @t.lamprecht , I thought so already, just making sure. @gecoit Will you give a try to upstream your code yourself? Or should we make a bugzilla feature request so the code can be written in another way?

And what if someone else does it, so not proxmox or the poster of arbitrary code themselves? I might give it a try then, in the hope that once it is upstream it stays maintained better. While not dealing daily with Windows myself I do have to offer it to my users and this would take a lot of...

Hi Guys, So, I'm in a situation where I want to change the ceph public network, I've read up on it quite a bit, and before "testing" it in production ;-) I built a virtual test environment, which amazed me, it was actually quite easy and I want to fact check it here... The virtual cluster...

Swapped the disks last Tuesday and the issue with CKSUM fault is resolved, so in the end this specific Toshiba model doesn't seem to be playing well with ZFS.

It seems that the problem is related to the disk model... https://www.truenas.com/community/threads/disc-degraded.90037/ They aren't broken, but something is not right, sadly the topic at Truenas was never solved, yet all the possible causes there have already been excluded in our set-up...

Hi guys, For some weeks now I'm trying to tackle a issue with one of my PBS nodes. It has worked perfectly fine for a while, a month or 2 ago I discovered that CKSUM errors were happening on the zpool across all SAS HDD's With permanent data damage as a result. Our pool consists of: 8 mirrors...

Cool! :D No problem, glad to help! Thank you for your time and such a wonderful product @t.lamprecht @Stoiko Ivanov Looking forward to the patch.

Hi @t.lamprecht That is the whole problem, the validation-delay set by the GUI / CLI within proxmox is not being honored / passed trough to the plugin, it is not the internal setting. I'm aware of the rate limit :) { "type": "dns-01", "status": "invalid", "error": { "type"...