dakralex's latest activity

  • dakralex
    dakralex replied to the thread NETDEV Watchdog timed out.
    Hi! Um welches Netzwerkinterface handelt es sich? Wenn der Intel e1000e-Treiber verwendet wird, hilft womöglich die Information in [0]? Wenn die Fehlermeldungen direkt auf den Terminal tty0 gehen, könntest du einen anderen Terminal verwenden...
  • dakralex
    Das wird durch den Fencing-Mechanismus sichergestellt: Standardmäßig verwendet der HA Stack das softdog Kernel Modul, welches unter Normalbedingungen in regelmäßigen Abständen diesen Watchdog resettet. Das kann aber nur passieren, wenn das LRM...
  • dakralex
    I submitted a bug, see https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6907 Manually updating regex allows VM to start. Mostly posting here for visibility and hope that a fix can be integrated so I can stop manually patching code on live servers :).
  • dakralex
    Hi! Wenn "im Netzwerk isoliere" bedeutet, dass die Node keine Verbindung mehr zu den anderen Nodes in dem Cluster hat, dann würde das bedeuten, dass dadurch die ganze Node gefenced wird auf der die HA-Container laufen. Das bedeutet dann...
  • dakralex
    Hi! Proxmox distributes its own patched ifupdown2 packages, so it's best to check if these issues are because of changes done there first. Either way, it should be checked out properly by creating a Bugzilla entry for this. Also the ifupdown2...
  • dakralex
    From the apt history it looks like there was an in-between upgrade to many packages from Proxmox VE 9: Start-Date: 2025-10-05 16:21:44 Commandline: apt upgrade Install: [...] proxmox-kernel-6.14:amd64 (6.14.11-3, automatic)...
  • dakralex
    Hi! I haven't tried to reproduce it yet: When was the update performed? Has the watchdog been inactive before already (some recent entries in journalctl -u watchdog-mux)?
  • dakralex
    Yes, apt dist-upgrade/apt full-upgrade must be used instead of apt upgrade as described in [0], because among other things the latter will make packages stay on a lower versioned package instead of resolving the package dependencies correctly...
  • dakralex
    dakralex replied to the thread Issues with corosync.
    Hi! What network does corosync run on? Does it have a dedicated network interface or is it shared with some other network resources? These are quite high numbers, the network should have a very low latency. [0] This seems like that for some...
  • dakralex
    Hi! Could you post some syslog on these nodes? Is HA setup on these nodes?
  • dakralex
    Thanks, everything was resolved by updating to pve-manager/9.0.10 my nerves are saved :)
  • dakralex
    Does the performance improve if you upgrade to a newer version of pve-manager? There were some performance-related improvements in pve-manager >= 9.0.8.
  • dakralex
    Hi! Which exact version of pve-manager have you upgraded to (e.g. pveversion)? Could you post a syslog from one of the nodes you are experiencing the problems on?
  • dakralex
    Thanks guys! I've got a mini pc with an M.2 E key -> 4x SATA adapter (ASM1064) it required `pci_aspm=off` under 6.8 kernel to boot correctly. After update to kernel 6.14 it would not boot correctly even with that option, but additional...
  • dakralex
    Hi! What is the config of such a VM that fails to migrate (output of qm config <vmid>)? What does the tasklog show if the VM is migrated through HA? What does it show if the VM is migrated manually (does it work that way?)?
  • dakralex
    dakralex replied to the thread HA version 9 issue.
    Hi! Which web guide are you referring to? HA groups have been deprecated in favor of the (semantically) equivalent HA node rules in Proxmox VE 9. The reason was primarily to aggregate those relationships in a single view, allow further...
  • dakralex
    dakralex replied to the thread HA version 9 issue.
    Hi! Have you upgraded the Proxmox VE host from version 8 to 9 or is it a new install? Either way, HA groups have been deprecated in favor of HA node affinity rules and these are feature-compatible, even though they are presented slightly...
  • dakralex
    Fair point. It might be sensible to allow choosing a rule name (possible via API, but not UI) and to allow selecting which rule(s) a VM should belong to upon creation. Feel free to open a feature request for these: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/...
  • dakralex
    Hi! Thanks for the input! The linked feature request is still quite general in its description, but it is focused on the dynamic load balancing of HA resources first, i.e., the storage must be shared across the cluster nodes (or HA node...
  • dakralex
    Hi! Which version of pve-manager and pve-ha-manager are you running on the nodes in the cluster? When the pve-ha-manager package is upgraded (which is dependent on upgrades to pve-manager), the LRM is put in restart mode and the local HA...