Colin 't Hart's latest activity
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Remote sync extremely slow.I'm still not convinced the current sync protocol can't be improved to take advantage of rsync-like smarts. But maybe it's just me not being used to how long the initial syncs take. I did manage to find a few areas for improvement in our infra...
-
CAFAIK the pull/push direction has no bearing on speed. It’s more a function of design/security. A pull job doesn’t remove anything for example.
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Remote sync extremely slow.I just realised that all the traffic is double-encrypted as it's going over inter-site VPN too. I can make the traffic go directly over the Internet and see if that helps. Currently it's receiving about 24mbit. Right now I'm pulling on the...
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Remote sync extremely slow.No limiting in the routers at each end. They are both EdgeRouter X. The overall speed is limited by one end being 100mbit. We've never noticed any sort of slow speeds in these fantastic little routers. I notice that it supports Smart Queue...
-
CColin 't Hart posted the thread Remote sync extremely slow in Proxmox Backup: Installation and configuration.Hi, We're wanting to replace a somewhat home-grown backup solution based on rsnapshot and rsync with Proxmox Backup Server. The rsnapshot solution uses rsync to mirror the backups to other servers, including one off-site. I have Proxmox Backup...
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration?.And I came here after I installed PBS on top of an existing old-many-times-upgraded Debian install. The network interface wasn't initialised as it should. It turned out to be a different issue, but when I compared it to my new PBS install, I...
-
CColin 't Hart reacted to stv.Bundesadmin's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with
Like.
AFAIK /etc/systemd/network/ is a good place for .link files - /etc/ really is the first place i would look for them. (We've had it there since 7.x and still in 9.2; we pin manually with more insightful names than the pinning tool nowadays... -
CColin 't Hart reacted to reg_ed's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
I came here to ask the question about whether there is a good reason that I shouldn't move my .link files to /etc/systemd/network (which is where the man pages seem to suggest they should be anyway) so I was pleased to find this thread at the top...
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration?.No real opinion for me, as long as all config files are under /etc somewhere for grepability, backupability, etc. And this file is generated by the installer so there shouldn't be any preexisting files?
-
CColin 't Hart reacted to shanreich's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
Iirc, one reason was to prevent clashes with potentially pre-existing configuration files in /etc. We could maybe implement specifiying the base path for the generated files to circumvent that and enable generation of the link files in /etc?
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration?.Any Proxmox dev have any answer to my question?
-
CColin 't Hart reacted to Gilberto Ferreira's post in the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration? with Like.
Hi... I am using pve-network-interface-pinning to pin enp1s0, for instance, to eth0, eth1... and so on. I have 9 nic each server. But I need to change the hardware and after that, all nic turns back to previously name, like enp1s0, when I use ip...
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Where pve-network-interface-pinning store it's configuration?.Sorry, but *why* is this configuration information being stored outside of /etc ?
-
CColin 't Hart reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
CColin 't Hart reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Backup Server 4.2 released! with Like.
We're pleased to announce the release of Proxmox Backup Server 4.2. This version is based on Debian 13.4 ("Trixie"), uses Linux kernel 7.0 as the new stable default for improved hardware support, and comes with ZFS 2.4 for reliable...
-
CColin 't Hart replied to the thread Cannot open /proc/stat: Transport endpoint is not connected.I was getting this in Debian 13 web server hosted inside Proxmox 9.1.7 Running `uptime` yielded a clue: Mounting the proc filesystem as suggested solved the problem, but why haven't I run into this before...?