carles89's latest activity
-
Ccarles89 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Feedback: lack of host backup has me reconsidering use of Proxmox with
Like.
I think you have a misconception of what an appliance is (or rather, what seperates an appliance from a managed software stack.) an appliance doesnt NEED backing up. its an appliance. restoration of a failed appliance is just redeploying it. In... -
Ccarles89 reacted to k12nate's post in the thread Feedback: lack of host backup has me reconsidering use of Proxmox with Like.
What features are you setting up on your hosts that are such great effort to deploy? Can you give specifics? My $.02, ymmv. As someone who recently migrated and expanded from a 3 node Vsphere cluster to 5 node Proxmox cluster and moved from...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to fiona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
From the analysis until now, the IO pressure seems to be a cosmetic issue or rather accounting issue in the kernel. QEMU switched to using io_uring for event loops with QEMU 10.2. The issue appears in combination with IO threads, where a blocking...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to beisser's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
its like using debian sid and then complaining about issues with it. according to his logic debian sid should be qc-tested since the repository is available to thousands. thats not how it works. test = bleeding edge stuff with a decent chance...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to uzumo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Those expectations arise precisely because you’ve actually used it and experienced its shortcomings firsthand. I understand your concerns, but ultimately, the use of the test repository is at your own risk.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to beisser's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
i repeat, dont use the test-repo for production. developers state its only for testing-purposes and not for production-use as evidenced by my screenshot from their own wiki. you ignoring this is purely on you and on noone else. you could have run...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to ness1602's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
I cannot imagine manager who said "let's use test repo", and then blames everyone else on that decision.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to monkfish's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Sorry, I'm out. All of the above is on you. Who told you to implement the "test" repository in "an enterprise-grade environment of this scale". It is not published in either pve-no-subscription or pve-enterprise repositories. I don't dispute...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to beisser's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
@djsami thats why you dont use the test repository in production. as the name implies it is a repository for testing things. its bleeding edge stuff. if you need things to just work, use the enterprise repository, where only well tested releases...