carles89's latest activity
-
Ccarles89 reacted to Kingneutron's post in the thread Proxmox user base seems rather thin? with
Like.
U = FOS Lots of us here are in tech-support related positions, so forum support gets to seem like "more work" after a while. A) Watch proxmox-related youtube videos B) Read the last 30 days of forum posts, here and on Reddit (free education)... -
Ccarles89 reacted to sbraz's post in the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox VE 8 to 9 on OVH bare metal servers with Like.
Hi, I work for OVHcloud on our OS images and I can indeed reproduce the problem on UEFI boot servers with PVE 8 installed on more than one disk with OVHcloud's installer. I'll first provide the solution and then explain why this issue occurs...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to l.leahu-vladucu's post in the thread [SOLVED] how to make future updates no longer break nvidia. with Like.
Hello diversity! Updates are important for security, so you did the right thing. You are using the proprietary Nvidia driver, right? The situation with the Nvidia driver is a bit more complicated, since using it requires having the kernel headers...
-
CSame. 128 cores and NVMe all around, less than 1% CPU overall while doing verification.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to spirit's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Inside Proxmox VE 9 SAN Snapshot Support with Like.
Hi, thanks for the article, I hope you enjoy my work ^_^ about performance, they are still performance improvement possible, mostly with qemu l2 cache size. Currently it's really depend of the qcow2 volume size, it's working up to around...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to bbgeek17's post in the thread [TUTORIAL] Inside Proxmox VE 9 SAN Snapshot Support with Like.
Hi Everyone, I'm excited to share a deep dive into one of the notable new feature in PVE9: the enhanced snapshot functionality designed for legacy SANs. This feature represents a meaningful step forward in expanding PVE's compatibility with...
-
CPlease check that your setup match the recommendations at https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Deploy_Hyper-Converged_Ceph_Cluster#_recommendations_for_a_healthy_ceph_cluster and https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Cluster_Manager#pvecm_cluster_network A...
-
CThis backup restore speedups got some detailed publicity. Jan Sedlák of Lupa.cz asked me about all the little details and it got into the article almost without editing. Please excuse the title, it's not my doing, this was a global effort with...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.0 released! with Like.
We are pleased to announce the first stable release of Proxmox Virtual Environment v9.0 - immediately available for download! The new version is based on the great Debian 13 "Trixie" but we're using a newer Linux kernel 6.14.8-2 as stable...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.0 released! with Like.
We are pleased to announce the first stable release of Proxmox Virtual Environment v9.0 - immediately available for download! The new version is based on the great Debian 13 "Trixie" but we're using a newer Linux kernel 6.14.8-2 as stable...
-
CHi, qm can control only vms on the node, it is running on. I would use pvesh and also use it to look up on which node the vm is running on. Something like this (requires jq installed): TARGET=100 NODE=$(pvesh get /cluster/resources...
-
CSlight nitpick: writeback should honor flushes (like fsync) and only buffer async writes. That's what differentiates it with writeback(unsafe) which fakes flushes and also buffers sync writes.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to Sprinterfreak's post in the thread bond-miimon missing when bond is created via UI with Like.
I have just installed a new pbs server with an active-backup bond setup. After creating a new bond interface via UI, the rendered /etc/network/interface confg is missing the bond-miimon 100 parameter, which basically prevents any slave interface...
-
CWe are pleased to announce the first beta release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.0! The 9.x family is based on the great Debian 13 "Trixie" and comes with a 6.14.8-1 kernel, QEMU 10.0.2, LXC 6.0.4, OpenZFS 2.3.3. Note: The current release of...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Yet another "ZFS on HW-RAID" Thread (with benchmarks) with Like.
I forgot about this thread and that your question (and almost everything else I just said) was covered earlier in the thread :) THIS.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to IsThisThingOn's post in the thread Yet another "ZFS on HW-RAID" Thread (with benchmarks) with Like.
I would not say it is dangerous per se, I only think it adds an unnecessary point of failue. Simply because it is added hardware. Sure, the same thing is true for an HBA card, but not to the same extent, since it is less complex. But my...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Yet another "ZFS on HW-RAID" Thread (with benchmarks) with Like.
The term, risk, doesnt mean what you think it means. there's a RISK of a meteor falling on you. the fact it didnt happen doesnt lower that risk. Same goes for the term absolutely. see Dunning-Krueger effect. The difference between a RAID...