carles89's latest activity
-
Ccarles89 reacted to sterzy's post in the thread Update impossible after upgrade to PDM 1.1.1 with
Like.
As promised a short update: The patch got applied and will be included in the 1.1.4 update for proxmox-datacenter-manager [1]. The package has not yet been published, it will likely become available shortly. Once it is available you should be... -
Ccarles89 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We just dropped the grouping as the group-parent menu was an empty panel, so provided no real value as is. It's all still there though:
-
Ccarles89 reacted to fiona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Snapshots error - qmp command 'blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync' failed - Cannot find device='drive-tpmstate0' with Like.
Hi, this is a regression and is fixed in qemu-server >= 9.1.10, which currently is going through internal testing and should reach the pve-test and no-subscription repositories in the following days (the enterprise repository has...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to janus57's post in the thread Way more NAGware, very little functionality, bugs galore with Like.
Hi, Promos staff have already responded to that to your post (see : https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/message-no-valid-subscriptions.177349/#post-825922). Community subscription is for enterprise repo of pve, pbs or pmg, not PDM (which can...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to jafurlan's post in the thread ceph-osd crashes with kernel 6.17.2-1-pve on Dell system with Like.
We've been hitting this issue on the same hardware. Dell R660xs - PERC H755N raid controller, latest firmware. NVMe drives are passed through as a non-raid disk, running a Ceph cluster as well. Stable on 6.14, crashes randomly usually during...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to Lukas Wagner's post in the thread PDM missing backup jobs from PVE / Log retention with Like.
I could reproduce the issue and submitted a fix to the development mailing list. https://lore.proxmox.com/pdm-devel/20260529133951.326103-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com/T/#t
-
Ccarles89 reacted to tcabernoch's post in the thread MSSQL Differential Backups, VSS, and PBS with Like.
We have a client that wants "differential" MSSQL backups. I don't know why they want this. Usually we do a Full and hourly Logs. But they do specifically want 'differential' backups. And they are failing. Our DBA figured out why its failing...
-
Ccarles89 replied to the thread PDM missing backup jobs from PVE / Log retention.Hi Lukas, Before trying anything, I've upgraded to PDM 1.1, but the issue persisted. systemctl stop proxmox-datacenter-api.service rm /var/cache/proxmox-datacenter-manager/remote-tasks/state systemctl start proxmox-datacenter-api.service That...
-
Ccarles89 replied to the thread PDM missing backup jobs from PVE / Log retention.Same here, we've a PDM instance connected to several remotes, and in one of them we cannot see all completed backup tasks listed on PDM. It seems random, some tasks show, some tasks don't. All of them appear on PVE side (as completed). PVE...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to woma's post in the thread Moving from 3-node full-mesh SDN to a 6-node using switches with Like.
Hi Patrick, Because new and old machines are same numbers you will have resources to temporarily run all guests only using new machines, so my safe and boring approach would be: build new 3 node cluster connected to switches setup up and test...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to alexskysilk's post in the thread Feedback: lack of host backup has me reconsidering use of Proxmox with Like.
I think you have a misconception of what an appliance is (or rather, what seperates an appliance from a managed software stack.) an appliance doesnt NEED backing up. its an appliance. restoration of a failed appliance is just redeploying it. In...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to k12nate's post in the thread Feedback: lack of host backup has me reconsidering use of Proxmox with Like.
What features are you setting up on your hosts that are such great effort to deploy? Can you give specifics? My $.02, ymmv. As someone who recently migrated and expanded from a 3 node Vsphere cluster to 5 node Proxmox cluster and moved from...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to fiona's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
From the analysis until now, the IO pressure seems to be a cosmetic issue or rather accounting issue in the kernel. QEMU switched to using io_uring for event loops with QEMU 10.2. The issue appears in combination with IO threads, where a blocking...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to beisser's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
its like using debian sid and then complaining about issues with it. according to his logic debian sid should be qc-tested since the repository is available to thousands. thats not how it works. test = bleeding edge stuff with a decent chance...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to uzumo's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Those expectations arise precisely because you’ve actually used it and experienced its shortcomings firsthand. I understand your concerns, but ultimately, the use of the test repository is at your own risk.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to beisser's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
i repeat, dont use the test-repo for production. developers state its only for testing-purposes and not for production-use as evidenced by my screenshot from their own wiki. you ignoring this is purely on you and on noone else. you could have run...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to ness1602's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
I cannot imagine manager who said "let's use test repo", and then blames everyone else on that decision.
-
Ccarles89 reacted to monkfish's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
Sorry, I'm out. All of the above is on you. Who told you to implement the "test" repository in "an enterprise-grade environment of this scale". It is not published in either pve-no-subscription or pve-enterprise repositories. I don't dispute...
-
Ccarles89 reacted to beisser's post in the thread [SOLVED] Applying pve-qemu-kvm 10.2.1-1 may cause extremely high “I/O Delay” and extremely high “I/O pressure stalls”. (Patches in the test repository with Like.
@djsami thats why you dont use the test repository in production. as the name implies it is a repository for testing things. its bleeding edge stuff. if you need things to just work, use the enterprise repository, where only well tested releases...