blackpaw's latest activity

  • B
    blackpaw reacted to martin's post in the thread Celebrating 20 Years of Proxmox with Like Like.
    Today we are really excited to celebrate 20 years of Proxmox Server Solutions. When Dietmar and I founded Proxmox 20 years ago, our vision was clear: to create efficient and easy-to-manage Linux software solutions for everyone. Looking back, it's...
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager - First Alpha Release with Like Like.
    No! But if you have the datacenter, you don't need clusters just to have all pve hosts in one ui. So the idea is that instead of one cluster with two or three nodes you would have all three nodes as three single-node "clusters" together in the dc ui
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager - First Alpha Release.
    Ah, so even if cluster quorum is broken, you can access individual nodes via the DC UI? That is useful.
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager - First Alpha Release with Like Like.
    One advantage of the datacenter is that you don't need a cluster to have all in one ui, which avoids issues with broken clusters due to network latency issues.
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager - First Alpha Release.
    Very interesting. One question - if you're running a single small cluster, i.e a typical homelab or SMB setup, is there much advantage to using Datacenter over the std cluster UI, or is it more aimed at large multiple cluster setups?
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    Be interesting to see how it works for you, I tried it between two different model Intel GPU's, no surprise, that died on its ass :) But still great for offline migrations.
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to Randell's post in the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released! with Like Like.
    I just did an edit to my post with a screen capture showing that option is disabled. I even removed the mapping and tried to add it again and it wasn't enabled. Maybe these old cards aren't supported, or I'm missing some other option to enable...
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    A Resource Mapping? their an option in the Mapping for allow live migrations.
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to Askey307's post in the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released! with Like Like.
    @proxmox Staff - Just a thank you note for the great work. This update came just 48 hours before upgrading several multi location clusters during a maintenance window schedule a while ago, that was only approved on 8.3.6 and 18.2.4 ceph before...
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to Colin 't Hart's post in the thread Persistently Use FUSE Inside of LXC Container with Like Like.
    Thanks. Ran into the exact some situation here.
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    Would a Virtiofs passthrough of a ZFS Mount be suitable as a datastore for a PBS VM?
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to scyto's post in the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released! with Like Like.
    Upgraded node one of my nodes in my proxmox/ceph/thunderbolt cluster to new release (wont upgrade ceph untill all nodes are on the new release) seems good so far. Have started to play with virtioFS passthrough of CephFS to my docker VMs (to...
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    If you have console access, on boot, choose an earlier kernel
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released! with Like Like.
    Johannes reply is on point, that said, now with the directory mappings we got a safe way to allow admins to configure which host directories certain users can access through the integrated PVE access control system. So this effectively removes...
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    Oh awesome, that would be perfect. Count me in for testing!
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to fabian's post in the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released! with Like Like.
    while virtiofs is specific to Qemu, we do plan on extending the "directory mapping" mechanism to provide a bind mount feature to non root users as well. integrating idmapping into that (using the same maps as the container itself) should be...
  • B
    blackpaw reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released! with Like Like.
    virtiofs is specific for qemu thus virtual machines, thus you can't use it in containers. It's quite unlikely that this will ever change since bind mounts are essentially virtiofs for lxc containers. I understand your feelings in regard how...
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    Yeah its tempting. I'm using the lxc for docker to run a media stack (plex + arrs) and it works pretty well apart from the bind mount for the media dir. I did have it properly mapped, uid and guid were correct in the lxc, but had weird access...
  • B
    blackpaw replied to the thread Proxmox VE 8.4 released!.
    Any chance of virtiofs being available for containers? would love an easier alternative for unprivileged containers than bind mounts. Getting the uid/gid mappings correct is a nightmare.
Show older items
Top Bottom