bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Prevent PVE trying to contact IScsi target through management network.Hi @KrAackers, welcome to the forum. PVE’s iSCSI discovery logs in to every portal the target advertises in the order they are listed by the Target The "Behavior B" in our guide covers this... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Restore files error.Hi @ccnet, To restore individual files the VM disk needs to be mounted and presented to the host, as opposed to restoring entire disk where its done at byte/sector level. Mounting Windows NTFS requires processing of several layers, one of them...
-
For reasons I cant quite understand, both phantom tasks (one "running" for 2 months) disappeared. @bbgeek17 if thats your doing I owe you a beer :D I didnt actually do anything...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Quorum failure and recovery.Hi @dafydd , Absent the quorum your /etc/pve is likely Read Only, which would prevent your containers from starting. The path below carries a certain risk and using it without proper full understanding is your call. On one node only run...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread HPE Nimble Storage Getting is not online 500.Run the commands listed in the article, describe the exact IP configuration of your storage and the PVE. When reporting back please use text copy/paste encoded with CODE tags. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread dead node and phantom tasks.I'd give this a try: systemctl try-reload-or-restart pvedaemon pveproxy pvestatd pvescheduler pve-ha-lrm This is a safe operation that we recommend doing on new plugin install. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread dead node and phantom tasks.The tasks are stored here: /var/log/pve/tasks/ There are individual tasks and index files that reference them. If you really want to get rid of those two you'd need to address the index files (probably! I've never done it!). Backup that folder...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Live migration corrupts thin pool metadata on shared LVM-thin (StarWind StarLVM plugin): request for a pre-resume storage hook in qemu-server.Hi @nvanaert , I read the full post this time. Your Claude analysis is spot on, and it shows one reason why LVM-thin on shared storage isn't supported in PVE. The hook is a question for pve-devel, but it only covers one code path. dm-thin keeps...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread New disk for my pve.Hi @zephir, welcome to the forum. Resizing the partitions and LVM (PV/VG/LV) is covered in many guides you can find online. The process is not PVE-specific. Whether you want to try to move your data or start from scratch is completely up to...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to Julian33's post in the thread off-topic. I can't be happier for these news. Congrats to the team with
Like.
Just read this Tesco Congrats to the team. Great win. Apologies, I could not find an off-topc forum section for sharing this. JCG -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Shutdown 3 nodes out of 5 nodes cluster in mix of v8.4 and v9.2.Hi @timlower, welcome to the forum. Running mixed versions in one cluster isn’t supported as a long-term setup, and cluster-wide operations on a mixed cluster can behave unpredictably. With all nodes on 9.2, you could use the cluster-wide HA...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Live migration corrupts thin pool metadata on shared LVM-thin (StarWind StarLVM plugin): request for a pre-resume storage hook in qemu-server.Hi @nvanaert , I admittedly paused my reading at the sentence above. However, I did manage to notice: Your question should first and foremost be addressed to the company that produced the plugin. LVM-thin is officially NOT supported by PVE...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Dell EMC Isilon X210.Hi @marcopettinelli , welcome to the forum. PVE is using Debian userland with Ubuntu Kernel. If you can find reports of successful Debian or Ubuntu installations on these boxes, you should be in a good shape. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [TUTORIAL] QuantaStor Proxmox Storage Plugin.Welcome to the eco-system! Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [TUTORIAL] QuantaStor Proxmox Storage Plugin v1.1.2: native PVE storage for VMs and containers.Glad we could help! Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread HPE Nimble Storage Getting is not online 500.There is not yet enough information to give you a confirmed "fix". I would recommend reviewing our article here: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/#connect-all-hosts-to-the-shared-storage In particular the connection...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread HPE Nimble Storage Getting is not online 500.Hi @maip , welcome to the forum. Please share what version of PVE you are running (pveversion). The context of your /etc/pve/storage.cfg . Are you able to ping the storage IP you specified? Run "pvesm status", followed by "journalctl -n 50"...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread CVE-2026-74580 vulnerability older PVE.Hi @levicoleman , welcome to the forum. In addition to the information provided by @EllerholdAG , consider the following: the last 5.x Proxmox kernel was pve-kernel-5.15.158-2-pve, uploaded to the bullseye (PVE 7) no-subscription repo on 26...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread mdadm array - How to use as storage?.Hey @Jeremy E , you should also use CODE tag </> rather than inline code >_ when posting large blocks of text. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Does PSA-2026-00068-1 Affect Kernels 6.x?.Hi @tonystriker , welcome to the forum. Looking at the Proxmox kernel changelogs, the relevant fixes appear in the 7.0 series in October 2026. The 7.0.14-23 changelog includes virtio-net header validation, and Proxmox identifies 7.0.14-24 (or...