bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    Hi @William Edwards , I am not part of PVE staff, and they will reply directly if they find it necessary. That said, I would check these: a) "pveversion --verbose" across all hosts b) consistency of /etc/resolv.conf across hosts c)...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread ServiceNow discovery.
    Hi @Logicman , you can absolutely create a user who is limited to "list/query" only ability. It is a good idea for the service you are talking about. You may need to experiment with specific permissions but in the end - the less the better...
  • bbgeek17
    Build yourself a rescue CD/USB, or boot vanilla Ubuntu from ISO, then see if you dongle works there. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    The last line "Link detected: no" is an indication of L1/2 issue. Generally that should be "yes" before you can proceed. Its unlikely that the BIOS/Firmware is affecting your link issue, but anything is possible. Try a different USB port...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @dbHA , welcome to the forum. As you can see from your /etc/network/interfaces the VMBR0 port is backed by enp1s0. However, as your "ip link" shows this interface name no longer exists. Most likely you had pending Kernel update that got...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Broken pipe 596.
    Hi @user8923428934, Its possible there is some transition state/race that you occasionally hit. Troubleshooting the cause will require a reproducible scenario, or detailed (logs/debug/trace) record of the event. The easier path is to add a retry...
  • bbgeek17
    This is an externally developed plugin and it is not supported or tested by PVE developers. Plugin documentation should the the primary source for presence of any options that might affect its functionality. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Update 8.4 to 9.0 or 9.1?.
    I believe you will always get the latest point release when upgrading via APT interface. The only way for you to get a particular 9.x release is a fresh install from ISO. Then you will need to avoid full system upgrades and/or hold particular...
  • bbgeek17
    With the presence of IPv6 config on the client, and NFS server advertising ability to handle IPv6, the Kernel will prefer IPv6. In your latest post the 169.x mount is not shown, and your query shifted to IPv6. The system has changed between the...
  • bbgeek17
    It appears that Proxmox website is experiencing difficulties right now. Here is a PVE partner page covering this topic: https://www.thomas-krenn.com/en/wiki/Proxmox_Remote_Migration Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for...
  • bbgeek17
    Great investigation @Gratified4693 and welcome to the forum. Have you tried to reach out to the provider of this plugin for support? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Great, you found the location where the errant IP is coming from. Remove this file and restart the services, or reboot the hosts: systemctl try-reload-or-restart pvedaemon pveproxy pvestatd pvescheduler pve-ha-lrm Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @FBFM, there is no official PVE method of mounting VMFS on a locally attached SAN LUN. There are several migration methods described here: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Migrate_to_Proxmox_VE , including an automatic import from running ESXi...
  • bbgeek17
    What is the context of "/etc/pve/.members" ? Have you "egrep -R old_ip /etc" ? I'd reboot both nodes again - at the same time. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Palathius, welcome to the forum It would be great if you mentioned more details on the steps you took to change PVE networking, in particular "tweaking". There is an orderly process to this, and it sounds like you may have missed a step...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread 2 Datacenters to 1.
    Hi Andygee1, Combining a VM-hosting node into existing cluster is not supported. You will need to clear out the node before joining it. There are still options to achieve your goal of merging the nodes and avoiding the loss of the config: -...
  • bbgeek17
    The gray question mark indicates that the daemon responsible for statistical and health updates was unable to talk to that node's software. It can also indicate that a subsystem on that node is not responding. The situation is often caused by...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Rappy , welcome to the forum. You have to distinguish two scenarios: a) you have two or more bare-bones vanilla Linux hosts where you map the same LUN, and use that LUN as if it was a local disk without any coordination b) you have cluster...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Freddy Lege , We have seen no issues in our testing with PVE 9.2 and Kernel 7. Perhaps you can expand with more details, i.e.: - storage vendor you are using - exact PVE versions (pveversion / pveversion -v - how the connections were...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @barndoor101, There is no reason for a single node outage to take out a 5 node healthy cluster. As such, there is no procedure to: You need to examine logs and system state of each surviving node in the cluster. There must be a secondary...