bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Wait until the SAN and LUNs are available before continuing with the Proxmox boot process.Another approach is to write a healthcheck/probe script that all the other PVE services will depend on. Once the probe determines that SAN is up - it lets the others to proceed. Or, the probe is independent and simply reboots the host when the... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.You can use pvesm command : https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pvesm.1.html Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.Then it sounds like you dont need to disable it? The subdirs are created by PVE as needed based on "context" option. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.The storage.cfg is a globally shared file within a cluster. The configuration in this file must be valid for all nodes. The name of the storage pool is unique cluster-wide. dir: local disable path /var/lib/vz content...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.As you can see from the output you posted (next time you should use CODE tag </>), the storage with question mark (magnus) is allowed to be present on both nodes. However, most likely is not present on node2 - hence the ?. The "local" dir...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Created cluster, one node storage gone.What is the context of your /etc/pve/storage.cfg? does it contain "node" restriction by chance? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] No Web gui and random connection reset by peer.Hello @bubblegoose, welcome to the forum. There is one issue we should address first: the format of the data you provided is very difficult to read. Forum members, myself included, would greatly appreciate it if you could edit your post and use...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.1 released! with
Like.
We are pleased to announce the release of Proxmox Datacenter Manager 1.1! This point release focuses on expanding visibility and automation for large-scale, multi-site deployments. Our main focus for this iteration has been introducing... -
I couldn't wait until tomorrow :). It is working now. Stupid mistake on my end. Thank you so much for getting me in the right place. I probably would have never gotten it. Much appreciated.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Noob with weird network issue.The system reported the above message, we have no reason to doubt this. If something changed since then - we have no evidence of it. An LACP bond that is misconfigured between two network nodes leads to an unpredictable behavior. Trying to...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Troubles Connecting Tintri NFS to Proxmox HA GUI.Most likely there is an issue (network or configuration) with RPC requests. The exports are probed via "showmount" and "rpcinfo". Try these commands manually, if they fail - the PVE probes will be unsuccessful and you will not be able to manage...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Noob with weird network issue.To be on the same page, none of this is PVE specific. You are dealing with basic Linux network management. At one point in the thread you mentioned that there is a "direct" connectivity between the clients, is there an actual direct cable? Your...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Noob with weird network issue.Wed May 27 12:54:51 2026] bond2: Warning: No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters in the bond I would recommend that you reduce your network complexity to bare minimum. Then start adding it back piece by piece, making sure...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Noob with weird network issue.You have two interfaces sitting on the same subnet, its very likely that this is what is tripping you up. I would recommend avoiding this configuration when possible. If you are curious, you should examine routes and ARP tables during the...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Snapshots with Shared iscsi Storage.There is a 3rd article that may be relevant: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-qemu-cache-none-qcow2/index.html Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
These writeups by @bbgeek17 should cover everything: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-qcow-snapshots-on-lvm/index.html https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.Happy to report that we have successfully run our storage-oriented CI/CD workflows against PVE 9.2, and no issues were uncovered during the initial test runs. Congratulations again on a solid release. Sincerely, Blockbridge Blockbridge ...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available! with Like.
We are excited to announce the release of Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2. This release focuses heavily on platform refinement, stability, and core optimization. Proxmox VE 9.2 is built on the robust Debian 13.5 "Trixie" and ships with Linux...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox Virtual Environment 9.2 available!.Congratulations! As usual, we will dedicate a separate environment for testing for our mutual customers. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
The deprecation itself was not strongly influenced by that, but the decision to communicate it more actively was in fact primarily driven by it. Normally, we only mentioned it on the side once a new kernel became the default. In the past, we...