bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Grey question marks at containers, VMs, hosts and storage.Thank you for the update @Womumba . Perhaps if you share the context of your /etc/pve/storage.cfg someone may point out what you should be looking at or testing. Clearly there is an issue with one of your remote storage being probed based on... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread No web GUI after upgrade from 9.0.11 to 9.1.6.Hi @Kordian , 99% of similarly reported issues were related to community script hack to remove subscription reminder on login. Recent versions of the hack implement a bash script hook that executes automatically and pulls/patches the files after...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Boot on FC SAN for installation.There is no officially endorsed way to implement such boot from PVE installer. I have seen success stories reported in the forum from people installing Debian to boot from SAN. I have no recent personal experience with booting from FC SAN, so...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.Thank you for the update @mikewich . As the OP you can now mark the thread as Solved by editing the first message and selecting the appropriate prefix for the subject. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Recommendation for software-defined storage for Proxmox on OVH (with Veeam snapshot integration).There is no storage level snapshot integration in a Veeam+PVE combination for any storage type. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Unable to update Proxmox: "Network is unrechable" despite the web gui still being accessible.Thank you for the update @Oa4McvMTSo An assumption that user did at least the basic review of the system and would mention a major change they made, gets me every time... Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Unable to update Proxmox: "Network is unrechable" despite the web gui still being accessible.Could this be related to your issue? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/apt-update-is-not-working.181181/#post-840788 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.This is not enough information. Given that you are using Pure and their support is known to be very good, perhaps you should reach out to them for help. Here is a list of things that you need to minimally provide so that forum volunteers can...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to mikewich's post in the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown with
Like.
also, we are using pure flash array. i following their instructions exactly as well as several other details from other places. -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cluster unusable due to NAS disruption.In the thread you referenced the poster shows evidence of Kernel lock. While "pvestatd" is a userland process, it interacts with Linux Kernel, and specifically SMB/NFS infrastructure. If the Kernel is wedged, "kill -9" will not help. If you had...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Cluster unusable due to NAS disruption.Have you restored your NAS services? If you have similar Kernel messages in your log as the other poster, and you have restored NAS services, then it seems that Kernel is unable to unwedge itself. Reboot is likely the only option in this case...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.My recommendations for next steps are unchanged. There is nothing else I can suggest as you continue to avoid providing actual system output. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Grey question marks at containers, VMs, hosts and storage.Given that "pvesm" talks somewhat directly to storage accessible to the node where you are running it from, chances are that you have an issue with storage access that trips up "pvestatd" and other components. I would remove all storage pools...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox 9.1.6 taking a snapshot takes up t 15 minutes.Hi @HenkS , welcome to the forum. This is an expected behaviour for QCOW snapshots over NFS. VMware does not use QCOW, their proprietary VMDK format employs completely different structure and snapshot architecture. Blockbridge : Ultra low...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Add an additonal SCSI controller to a VM hardware like in VMware.That's great! Thank you for the update. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 reacted to markosoftfl's post in the thread [SOLVED] Add an additonal SCSI controller to a VM hardware like in VMware with Like.
Hello you are correct I finally figured this out with the help of Deepseek. I was able to get the commands in the config file Here the example incase anyone else is looking. # Add this line to your VMID.conf file args: -device...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread User login failed.Type out your password in shell so you can confirm it is what you expect it to be. I suppose you don't have sudo for this user? You can always use the system recovery process to reset the root password. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread User login failed.qm is in /usr/sbin which may not be included in a path of the new user: which qm /usr/sbin/qm When logged in as new user via SSH - try to ssh into localhost, ie: ssh root@localhost is the password still working? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] apt update is not working.May be the admin of your MIMT had inadvertently broken things they didnt mean to proxy and now fixed it, or may be its the other way around. Good luck! PS you can run VPN for outside traffic and either punch holes for SSH, or run SSH over VPN...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VE_9.0.1 Fiber Channel only 1 of 3 hosts see the storage as active. Status Unknown.Hi @mikewich, welcome to the forum. You sound a bit frustrated, I get it, rebuilding nodes is never fun. To help effectively, we'll need to see the actual system state from each node. A few things worth keeping in mind: FC connectivity and...