bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Unable to clone or migrate storage of VM on LVM on iSCSI storage.https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/getting-help-plain.html https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/where-should-i-report-bug.102215/ https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Introduction#getting_help Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread help? SAN drives and cluster.If you are happy - we are happy. You can mark the thread as solved by editing the first post and adjusting the subject prefix. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread 2 Node with Msa.Hi @zav0k , The configuration you describe is pretty common. It works well when configured properly. There are many resources online that can help with your configuration, but nothing replaces hands-on work and deep understanding of each step. We...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Unable to clone or migrate storage of VM on LVM on iSCSI storage.It didn't seem that either reporter filed a bug with PVE. You may want to do so. I doubt the backend SAN version change will have any affect on this behavior. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Unable to clone or migrate storage of VM on LVM on iSCSI storage.https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/move-storage-fails-with-qemu-img-convert-invalid-argument.179123/ https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-cloning-corrupts-the-target-image-extensive-analysis-included.177841/#post-826710 Blockbridge : Ultra...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Unable to clone or migrate storage of VM on LVM on iSCSI storage.There were recently some bug fixes in this area. Make sure you are running with the latest code. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Using Directory instead of LVM with ISCSI multipath.You are missing critical step of creating a file system, as I've described in your other thread. However, you should not be creating regular file system on your shared block device. I'd recommend continuing to use your thread vs necroposting...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread help? SAN drives and cluster.Hi @williamss159 , If you want to store ISO, which are files, you need a filesystem. Filesystems can be created on top of a raw device , partition, or LVM slice. However, cluster of nodes is a special case. It requires a cluster aware...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Making a Ugreen NAS available to proxmox VM.You are welcome. That is exactly the topic of the discussion in the provided link. Note that this is an in-VM configuration, outside of the scope of PVE and this forum. There are many other discussions and tutorials on mounting CIFS share on...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Making a Ugreen NAS available to proxmox VM.Sounds like you just need to map CIFS share from VM directly to NAS. Your application may even have a wizard to do so. If it does not, add the mount to /etc/fstab...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Web and SSH access are sometimes unavailable.If you see the ACK leaving the physical port, then it is likely that the problem is further down the line in the infrastructure. Have you contacted OVH with your issue/findings? Do you have console access via OVH? Perhaps you can try to "ip link...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to UdoB's post in the thread Is it safe to use Proxmox VE (No-Subscription / Free) for small-scale production? with
Like.
The very clear and ultimate answer is of course: it depends! If you have enough experience to administrate a Debian server consistently and continuously over years, including disaster recovery, then you may go that route. (And use a single... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread help? SAN drives and cluster.@williamss159 , what do you mean by LCM? Perhaps LVM? LVM is a block type storage , there are no files or directories. If you follow one of many guides, including the one I posted earlier, PVE will be able to slice and dice pieces of overall LVM...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Clarification request – SAN FC shared storage, Proxmox snapshots and Veeam backup compatibility.You are welcome! Happy to hear you got it going. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 reacted to katti's post in the thread [SOLVED] Clarification request – SAN FC shared storage, Proxmox snapshots and Veeam backup compatibility with Like.
@bbgeek17 , Thank you. The plugin is now working correctly, and the backups are running successfully.
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread help? SAN drives and cluster.Here is another article that may be helpful: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Clarification request – SAN FC shared storage, Proxmox snapshots and Veeam backup compatibility.I just realized that the post you referenced is a summary of our KB article :) Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Clarification request – SAN FC shared storage, Proxmox snapshots and Veeam backup compatibility.Thank you for the link @katti. It so happens that we, at Blockbridge, are somewhat familiar with how Veeam operates: https://forums.veeam.com/proxmox-ve-f79/fyi-potential-data-corruption-issue-with-proxmox-t95796.html The forum post you...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Clarification request – SAN FC shared storage, Proxmox snapshots and Veeam backup compatibility.Hi @katti, You do not need storage snapshots for Veeam backup of any type of storage pool in PVE. 1 Yes, you can have snapshots with FC SAN by using new tech-preview feature...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Possible bug with qemu-img zeroinit and LVM.TBH, layering QCOW on a newly added LVM extent without manually zeroing it first seems like a recipe for trouble. This approach is unpopular because it slows provisioning, but it is the safer option. When QCOW is placed on a filesystem, zeroing...