bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] - Can't seem to upgrade....Depends on how one "stumbles" into learning about no-sub repo... Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] - Can't seem to upgrade....Enjoy PVE and see you in a few weeks when you come back with "my GUI stopped working and I did not change anything". This is based on the fact that you: - informed us that you are not an Enterprise subscription user in the now deleted post -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread proxmox 8 - how migrate vm without shared storage ?.I saw "6 pve" and inverted it to "pve 6". Nevermind... it was an interesting side adventure :-/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread proxmox 8 - how migrate vm without shared storage ?.HEre i His first screenshot in the opening post shows migration from node2 to node6, with LUN92 involved. It is not available to node6 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread storgae configuration.It should have "images" if you want to place VMs there. That is the nomenclature that PVE uses for VM virtual disks. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread proxmox 8 - how migrate vm without shared storage ?.You are running an OLD (unsupported) version of PVE. In fact, as of today Proxmox dropped the repository to support Buster. The code that generated the error you provided is different, improved, in newer versions...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox 9.1.4 import SUSE VM from ESXi.Hi @jeffgott , welcome to the forum. While I've never had to deal with SUSE on PVE, I'd recommend trying a fresh install Does that work? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread proxmox 8 - how migrate vm without shared storage ?.Your understanding is correct. @alexskysilk covered the "node" restriction that I think is missing in your case. If you have proper shared storage that is available to nodeA and nodeB - migration is an act of moving VM state and re-assigning...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox 9 with shared LVM on iSCSI problem.If you have not seen these articles yet, you may find them useful in your research: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-qcow-snapshots-on-lvm...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox 9 with shared LVM on iSCSI problem.VMware enables this behavior because it has VMFS - a cluster-aware, shared filesystem. VMFS implements proprietary on-disk locking and reservation mechanisms that safely coordinate multi-initiator access to the same disk. Proxmox does not...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread storgae configuration.From the screenshots you provided your boot disk is managed by LVM. "Local" is a special default/built-in storage pool that points to a directory located on the root partition (managed by LVM). It appears that you either did not create or removed...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] No network in Windows Server VMs with bond/802.3ad.Well, indeed doing a few searches does bring up similar threads from several years back, i.e.: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/win2019-vms-losing-network-connectivity.108719 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to ds88284's post in the thread Open with PVE UI adds wrong port at the end with
Like.
Thank you for the response! I actually found the answer in this forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/suggestion-for-open-in-pve-ui-option.171881/ I was able to go in and change the UI URL directly, which fixed my issue. -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] No network in Windows Server VMs with bond/802.3ad.You may be running into a MAC address conflict. Why are you manually assigning MAC addresses? There are no widespread reports of similar failures in the forum, none, in fact, so this appears to be something specific to your environment. The...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox 9 with shared LVM on iSCSI problem.You cannot have Shared storage in a two node non-cluster installation. Shared storage, as defined by PVE terminology, is part of the cluster. Everything you do after that is a road to data corruption. There are coordinated operations...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Raid Controller compatibility with Ceph.Hi @thanosg , welcome to the forum. Ceph does not have awareness of a model number or vendor of your raid controller. Practically any controller configured in non-raid mode is compatible. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread proxmox 8 - how migrate vm without shared storage ?.Hi @carnyx.io , you stated that you do NOT have shared storage, yet the screenshot is showing that all storage pools are marked as Shared. As shown in the screenshot the PVE is told by current configuration that it should expect the same storage...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread A guard rail suggestion to avoid losing everything like I just did..Hi @anthony1956 , welcome to the forum. While I sympathize with your situation and your request, we have all been there, what you are proposing is essentially a "knee-jerk" reaction and has very little chance of being implemented. It may make...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Is there a bulk API to fetch Proxmox VM UUID (smbios1) for multiple VMs at once?.Hi @Pravallika Modugula , welcome to the forum. To answer your question: my understanding is that only the resources query returns a limited configuration subset for all VMs. If the particular parameter you are looking for is not available...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] No network in Windows Server VMs with bond/802.3ad.You've already established that the bridge and underlying network works correctly, at least partially. The two main differences are VLAN numbers and type of the NIC. Have you tried to move your Windows guest to the same VLAN as a known working...