bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Can not create snapshot it says already exists.Based on the information provided we know that the VM configuration does not have a reference to any snapshots. However, the snapshots exits on the backend. They had to be created by an operator via PVE at some point. How the reference got lost... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Block format 'raw' does not support internal snapshots.Can you provide additional information: pveversion qm config [vmid] cat /etc/pve/storage.cfg cat /etc/pve/qemu-server/[vmid].conf pvesm status Are other VMs running on the same node? Are they located on the same storage (qm config [vmid]) Has...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Can not create snapshot it says already exists.The action you took is specific to snapshot, the error message is specific to snapshot, so we can be reasonably certain that the problem is related to snapshot management. However, it is likely not related to the origin of the VM. The fact that a...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Can not create snapshot it says already exists.The migration path is not relevant. You should examine the current state of the LVM as suggested previously. Post the results here as text output encoded with CODE tags. The two primary outcomes are: the snapshot exists on disk and does not exist...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Can not create snapshot it says already exists.You should start by checking your LVM structure: lvs lvdisplay etc I am not sure how you got into this state, backtracking your steps may be a good idea. If there is an edge case of snapshots being orphaned, I am sure developers would like to...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread removing iscsi multipath lun.Hi @ogrimia , welcome to the forum. You raised some strong points, and several of them certainly have merit. From what you’ve written, it sounds like you have the skills to make a real impact - why not consider applying for a position...
-
bbgeek17 reacted to PhiboBastiaans's post in the thread Downloading OCI images through the CLI instead of the GUI with
Like.
Ah - as I planned tonight - I intercepted the API call, converted it into a cURL command and that worked fine after a bit of tweaking. Maybe not the official way, but it works for me -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Downloading OCI images through the CLI instead of the GUI.Are you looking for: pveam ? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Shutdown policy 'migrate' and cluster poweroff.This may be helpful: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/clean-shutdown-of-whole-cluster.121116/#post-526462 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread removing iscsi multipath lun.You should be able to unmap a particular LUN from the target without affecting other LUNs. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox backup in NAS SYNOLOGY.I don't think this thread is about the session timeout. It's the fact that PVE uses SMB connect/teardown as a means to probe/healthcheck the CIFS storage. https://github.com/proxmox/pve-storage/blob/master/src/PVE/Storage/CIFSPlugin.pm#L271...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Proxmox backup in NAS SYNOLOGY.Hi @macmino, There are a few possible approaches here: Enable/disable the storage as needed. If it’s strictly used for backups, this might be sufficient, though I haven’t personally tested it (see man pvesm). Follow the workaround mentioned in...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI Networking confusion.Makes sense. In that case you can use LACP on storage and host side. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox with FC LUN.Hi @markeczzz . Yes, you can use the same hardware with PVE. It should be very stable, assuming there’s nothing unusual in your specific infrastructure. The best practices are essentially the same as with any FC-based setup: dual HBAs, dual...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI Networking confusion.Hi @tmerrill , welcome to the forum. This is the key to your question. Does the above mean that switches are not MLAG connected? A single VLAN that spans two isolated switches? You can take a look at this article...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Storage for production cluster.Hi @JonesHerbet, welcome to the forum. Since you’re looking to refresh your infrastructure, it’s worth taking a step back and considering a more comprehensive update. Replacing HDDs with NVMe is a good start. You should also review your network...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Multipath configuration to Pure storage array (VLANS).Sounds like something that would be perpetuated by a storage vendor who couldn't figure out how to build a good iSCSI stack and/or support an LACP bond :-) Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Multipath configuration to Pure storage array (VLANS).If this was my environment, I were limited in number of NICs that could be added to the host, and I was not looking to create a one-of-the-kind config, I would: - MLAG the network switches - configure LACP across the switches (either with MTU...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread How to use ISCSI for LXC storage.The storage content required for Containers is "rootdir". Not all supported storage pool types support all content types. For example, raw iSCSI storage (Block) does not support Snippets or ISO. The built-in iSCSI type also does not support...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Multipath configuration to Pure storage array (VLANS).You have an L2/L3/L4 issue, not L7. If nothing else changes - it will not make a difference whether you use NFS or iSCSI. Were you also running a hypervisor and placing the VMs on this host at the same time? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...