bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    Thank you very much!!! Hopefully the Proxmox team will notice and correct this as soon as possible. However, for now I have been advising all partners to uncheck this option, at least for the time being, in potential installations to avoid problems.
  • bbgeek17
    I had a "bright" idea to take a look at the code and the cause seems "simple" enough: https://github.com/proxmox/pve-common/blob/master/src/PVE/Network.pm#L691 my @ifaces = (); my $dir = "/sys/class/net/$bridge/brif"...
  • bbgeek17
    based on OP's description I don't see a reason for iSCSI traffic to ever be generated from 10/20/30 or passed to 100/101. So I do not think this would come up as an issue. I also do not see where OP mentions using Bond. It seems to me they have...
  • bbgeek17
    You could try to pass-through a direct LUN to the VM to get an idea about some baseline. Blockbridge: Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Unauthorized IP.
    Hi @pavlos , this is because you have not purchased support subscription and are not authorized to connect to ENTERPRISE.proxmox.com. Follow the steps to disable the Enterprise repo and to enable the no-subscription repo...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Entire cluster rebooted.
    As @leesteken pointed out, if the network handling Corosync fails long enough, each node becomes isolated from the others and loses quorum. To avoid a split-brain situation (i.e., node1 attempting to recover services that are still running on...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    Hi @naxiu , There are no wide-spread reports in the forum of web UI instability . There are occasional reports, such as yours, and in 99.9% of cases they are caused/resolved by: a) reconfiguring the smart-home routers , ie changing the DHCP...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    The UI is working, as in the service is running and is responding. As recommended previously, please research your network/router limitations. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    curl -k Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    The command you ran scans all suitable storage pools for orphan disks, so if you have an inoperable storage defined that would trip the command up. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    Have you checked the IP configuration of the hypervisor? Does vmbr0 indeed not have an interface attached? Compare the output of "ip a" and "cat /etc/network/interfaces" across the nodes. The error says that vmbr0 (which is a bridge) does not...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread I cannot connect to the WebUI.
    Please repeat the curl command with https prefix. Its very likely that your switch/router is blocking access on non-standard ports. Make sure that PVE IP is not within the DHCP range of the router. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    Ich bin sicher, dass es möglich sein wird, sobald Broadcom dem letzten Kunden den letzten Cent abgenommen hat und den VMFS-Code schließlich als Open Source freigibt. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Alwin Antreich Good question. I’d expect both cache=direct and cache=writethrough to offer stronger consistency guarantees, but I’ll run some tests and report back. For what it’s worth, some of the confusion around cache=none stems from...
  • bbgeek17
    Sadly there are still many limits around file management in legacy storage products. Feel free to mark this thread solved by editing the first post and selecting solved from the dropdown near the subject. This will help keep the forum tidy...
  • bbgeek17
    I've discovered this is a limitation of Dell Powerscale (hard coded 4TiB file size limit)...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread NVMe over TCP support?.
    Hi @PmUserZFS , apologies about missing your question earlier. Seems like you found a way on your own! Our connection management is wrapped in the native storage Plugin, but at a high level its similar. Live Migration implies cluster, cluster...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 reacted to aaron's post in the thread Support Licenses with Like Like.
    To be even more pedantic, ;) the subscription, depending on the level, will give access to the enterprise repository. Which we definitely recommend for production environments. And then, depending on the level, can also include support tickets...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @greg.amos@capitolimagings, and welcome to the forum. The error you’re seeing is most likely related to a limitation on the NAS side. The final “no space left” message is essentially a catch-all response, it’s what the client receives when...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Kurgan, Your question reminded me of another advantage of LVM: its volatile metadata doesn't reside in a user-land address space, so a process kill can't put it into a state that leads to data loss. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...