bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread PVE installation.Hi @zync, welcome to the forum. A good test to try is install vanilla Debian - do you have a similar challenge? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Adding storage to Datacenter.Hi @heytmi , welcome to the forum. Your question is more related to PVE part of the forum than PDM I recommend opening a thread there. Do include as much relevant technical information as possible. For example: lsblk fdisk -l pvs vgs lvs pvesm...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox with 48 nodes.Hi @Nathan Stratton and all, You need clear guidance here: do not do that unless you have a very compelling reason to. a) Your hardware is discontinued and past the end of service, which significantly increases the likelihood of component...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Bulk migration of servers from VMWare to Proxmox.The PVE endorsed methods are described here: https://www.proxmox.com/en/services/training-courses/videos/proxmox-virtual-environment/proxmox-ve-import-wizard-for-vmware https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Migrate_to_Proxmox_VE...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Bulk migration of servers from VMWare to Proxmox.Hi @imsuyog, welcome to the forum. With any migration path, you will need to invest some time and effort into testing how appropriate it is for your data. The migration will most likely involve data transfer, probably over an API, and may...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread cloud-init brain dump.Did you check the CI log after boot? Have you monitored the console output during the boot? (qm start xxx && qm monitor xxx). You presented you sanitized CI config but did not present the actual VM config. Keep in mind that according to ...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread open-iscsi-service failed to start after update to Proxmox 9.0.10 (6.14.11-3-pve).Did you only have VMs active on node1 when you restarted the nodes last time? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 reacted to leesteken's post in the thread Could we have a 'lab' subscription license? with
Like.
Turns out that Proxmox explicitly does not want donations: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/donation-to-proxmox-how-to-apologies-if-this-create-noise.173232/post-806352 . There have been threads before about additional (cheaper) subscription... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Curl not working on new install.May be your ISP is running openwrt on PI... Dust out tcpdump and start capturing and comparing traces :) Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Curl not working on new install.This is a good read: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/temporary-failure-in-name-resolution-help-needed.164020/ I think the summary is: DNS resolution failure that affected only PVE and only when used with internal router. Caused by new version...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Curl not working on new install.Are there VLANs involved? Have you tested MTU max size between the internal hosts on the switch? Does your switch implement some sort of "smart" filtering? The best approach is to keep reducing the number of variables and complexity of the test...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Shared storage over Fibre-Channel / iSCSI with thin provisioning and snapshots.Yes, you are absolutely correct. I was just pointing out that there is more than one downside. I realize OP may have been exaggerating with 99 PB; that said, the higher the over-provisioning ratio, the greater the chance that someone might take...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Shared storage over Fibre-Channel / iSCSI with thin provisioning and snapshots.The other downside is that if you do accidentally run out of space it will be somewhat catastrophic for your data. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread how to extend LVM-Thin after reconfiguring RAID5.Hi @davidedaps , welcome to the forum. Your request is not PVE specific but rather regarding general Linux system administration. There are many existing guides and discussions covering this questions. For example...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Curl not working on new install.All I can tell you is that in our lab we are running, or were at one point running, successfully: ESXi in PVE, PVE in ESXi, PVE and ESXi in Openstack, Openstack in ESXi. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread removing iscsi multipath lun.Every situation is unique, sure. You can, may be, unmap the LUN from the target on the SAN side If your steps work, go with them. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Curl not working on new install.Well, you can try few other things. For example, add "-4" to your curl options. Try a well known site, ie "curl https://www.google.com" Are you sure there is no proxy of any sort involved? May be you have wget specific config file? Just keep in...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] removal of storage with allocated disks is possible.There is an expectation that system administrators take precautionary steps before removing critical components of the system. In earlier versions, Proxmox VE included a safeguard that prevented storage from being removed while it was still in...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread removing iscsi multipath lun.Once you removed all higher level dependencies on the disk, ie there is no IO as checked by iostat, you can now disconnect/remove iSCSI sessions. Then you can work through your steps of removing the DM device and so on, including dmsetup...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Protection mechanism against APD events in PVE Cluster.Hi @giangi74 , welcome to the forum. There is no built-in mechanism in PVE to detect and react to storage path down event. Nor is there a mechanism to address user network path down, assuming cluster network is split from it. You might need to...