bbgeek17's latest activity
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VMs mass migration, from Libvirt to Proxmox.Which part of it do you want to avoid? You don't have to convert to qcow, you can use raw. You'd loose some functionality, so is that something you want to save? You have to get the disk to PVE, so you probably can't avoid it. Are disks on NFS... -
bbgeek17 replied to the thread send email from proxmox from terminal (without installing additional mail client).https://chatgpt.com/share/68f8f677-3ce8-800a-906c-b30a5bbfa3f9 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread TrueNAS Storage Plugin.Hi @warlocksyno , Thanks for your kind words! To be honest, it's unlikely that tweaking iSCSI at the protocol level will suddenly unlock a new level of performance. In our experience, we rarely touch the low-level iSCSI settings... mostly only...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] QDevice Deployment.It’s designed to support multiple clusters and is almost configuration and state free Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Veeam Restore vSphere to ProxMox.Hi @akjome , The most suitable place for your question would be Veeam Support, followed by the Veeam Forum, and finally here. Until recently, Veeam was not compatible with PVE 9, which could cause the same type of error you’re reporting. Are...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread performance of SAN nvme storage.Understood. LVM does have performance limits, but you're well below them. If it were me, I'd start by testing read-only workloads directly on the LV - no infrastructure fiddling required. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread performance of SAN nvme storage.Thanks for sharing all this data. From what I can tell, one of two things is likely true: either the storage system isn't delivering the expected performance (possibly due to its disk configuration), or the host hardware setup isn't able to...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Blank Web Interface 9.0.11.Enjoy PVE. You can mark the thread as solved by editing first post and selecting the dropdown near the subject Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread WEB API for Proxmox 9 HA rules.Does /ha/status provide you what you are looking for? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Blank Web Interface 9.0.11.If you read the referenced thread, you saw that some of those "enhancements" break systems. Whether your system is broken in the same way, only you can figure out. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] Blank Web Interface 9.0.11.welcome to the forum @JGH-Mike . Have you installed any "enhancements" for PVE previously? Have you checked similar threads? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/web-portal-issue-after-updates.172965/#post-807076 Make sure you remove any...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Unable to Update Fresh Install.Sounds like a hardware issue. Have you checked dmesg and jornalctl? Run memtest? Disk check? Updated all firmware? Another option is to install Debian and test that way, or Ubuntu. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] qm importdisk increased the disk size from 96.5GB to 476.94 GB.@JAZZIT Support , glad I could help. With @gfngfn256's input, if you feel like your questions were answered - feel free to edit the first post and select "solved" from the drop down. This helps keep the forum organized. Blockbridge : Ultra low...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread [SOLVED] qm importdisk increased the disk size from 96.5GB to 476.94 GB.Hi @JAZZIT Support , What does qemu-img info [original_file] say? Whats do lsblk and lvs show? What about lvdisplay /dev/pve/vm-101-disk-1 ? Just because the partitioned/formatted space in original Windows server was 100G, does not mean that...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread VM blocked with backup or migration.Congratulations @Reartu24 . Veeam, and perhaps Nakivio, use the underlying Qemu commands to manipulate block devices during the backup. If the device is already being used by another Qemu command from the same family, its not surprising that...
-
Luckily, I managed to unblock the locked VM over the weekend. Thanks to Croit's advice, the migration was unblocked, and I was able to cone the VM and restore operation. The thing that was absurd to me, and I don't understand it, is that not...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox VE Web GUI is a Blank Page.I believe you are showing only the last portion of the response? The full response is as you reported in comment #3 ? If I am correct, the "body" portion you are seeing is _normal_. This is the same as what I get on our fully functioning PVE. In...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread qbittorent and proxmox newbie.Hi @extensive , welcome to the forum. The problem you are getting is not directly related to the operation of the PVE. You should reach out to the authors of the community scripts and report this to them. They are in the best position of knowing...
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI Shared Storage Configuration for 3-Node Proxmox Cluster.Sounds like an excellent plan @Jochem . Good luck and keep us updated. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
-
bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI Shared Storage Configuration for 3-Node Proxmox Cluster.What you have now: Is not one of the options I proposed. You have not provided details on what exactly you are doing, but it sounds like possibly ZFS/iSCSI scheme. If thats what you are trying to do - implementing HA is on you. There are many...
