bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    Hi @chrits5981 , welcome to the forum. The first test you should run is: curl -k https://xxx.xxx.xx.xx:8006 Does this work between the nodes? Also, does SSH work across the nodes? Does the error message provide any additional details? Check...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @pmt_cnq, The first thing to evaluate is your cluster and node distribution. For a Primary/Standby site setup, you’ll need to introduce a third site. With your current 3-node cluster majority located in Site1, failure of Site1 means Site2...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @peshik , welcome to the forum! Currently, the only supported release of Proxmox VE is PVE 8. All previous versions have reached their end of life. Keep in mind that PVE is built on Debian with a Ubuntu-derived kernel, so hardware...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @zccq, welcome to the forum. The repository should not be automatically changed to enterprise. Perhaps you can use GUI (Datacenter>Nodes>[node]>Repositories) to disable the Enterprise repos and enable no-sub ones. Make sure to run "apt...
  • bbgeek17
    No, the file names themselves are somewhat arbitrary and don't matter functionally. That said, /etc/apt/sources.list is typically managed by the OS and comes with default entries. Custom repositories, whether for users or applications, are...
  • bbgeek17
    We do not use this plugin internally, so I do not know what might be broken. Please understand that this is a third-party plugin. PVE developers do not test these plugins for compatibility, the responsibility lies with the third-party...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @uzumo , The external storage plugins are available and functional. However, it looks like the specific plugin you're using has become outdated and may no longer be actively maintained. There have been a few discussions on the forum about...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9.0 BETA released!.
    We're pleased to share that PVE 9 Beta has successfully passed our storage regression tests, aligned with the feature set of PVE 8. Along the way, we identified a regression related to sg3-utils, which was promptly incorporated/resolved by the...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread DUP packets on ping.
    If this was my setup, I'd get a network trace on the physical interfaces of both sides of ICMP connection to confirm whether the duplicate ICMPs are actually sent. To further reduce complexity - take two hosts, direct connect them via a cable...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread DUP packets on ping.
    Hi @ntnll , To begin, it's important to note that PVE is not a standalone OS, but rather a set of packages installed on a base Linux distribution - specifically Debian, with an Ubuntu-derived kernel. At the networking layer, PVE uses the...
  • bbgeek17
    I suspect it's your router/gateway. That said, I don't have a "turn this knob" solution for you. If it was me, I'd have to roll up my sleeves and dive into debug logs of ssh/sshd as well as network traces. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    And what is the actual running configuration? "ip a" Have you tested full ICMP packet: ping -c 4 -M do -s 1472 <destination> in all directions from all hosts (pve<>gw,pve<>client, within the vlan, across vlans). Blockbridge : Ultra low...
  • bbgeek17
    What was your expectation when you added two ports into the bridge? I'd recommend removing one. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    At the SSH level connectivity disruption - PVE is a Linux host, specifically Debian with Ubuntu derived Kernel. You said everything works when the hosts are collocated on the same VLAN - is tagging involved? is it native VLAN? Have you tried...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Th3ddy , it seems like you used one of the methods to "enhance" PVE by removing the subscription nag. I'd recommend to trace your steps back to undo it, or reach out to the publisher for help. Good luck Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    It possibly a VLAN/MTU issue, where the VLAN header over-subscribes the MTU size. Or perhaps some other unique combination of VLAN/Router/NIC/etc. Let us know if you get to the bottom of it. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread ME5024 and Proxmox 8.
    Yes, my apologies, I completely misread your post - please see my corrected reply above. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread ME5024 and Proxmox 8.
    PS fixing post as I misread it due to lack of coffee in the blood stream :-) Hi @Alyke , there are two primary ways to configure iSCSI in PVE: manual and via PVE. You should try to stick to PVE managed option, as it is easier. Once you've...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @xbluethunderx , I would concentrate on troubleshooting the SSH connection. A few common culprits are: 100% full root disk and duplicate IP. If both check out ok, you can run SSHD in monitoring mode (-D) to see if it logs anything when the...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread Proxmox VE 9.0 BETA released!.
    Hi all, While this is an OS issue, rather than PVE - it is worth mentioning in this thread: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/psa-debian-trixie-sg3_utils-regression-sg_inq.168883/ Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage...