bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Palathius, welcome to the forum It would be great if you mentioned more details on the steps you took to change PVE networking, in particular "tweaking". There is an orderly process to this, and it sounds like you may have missed a step...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread 2 Datacenters to 1.
    Hi Andygee1, Combining a VM-hosting node into existing cluster is not supported. You will need to clear out the node before joining it. There are still options to achieve your goal of merging the nodes and avoiding the loss of the config: -...
  • bbgeek17
    The gray question mark indicates that the daemon responsible for statistical and health updates was unable to talk to that node's software. It can also indicate that a subsystem on that node is not responding. The situation is often caused by...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Rappy , welcome to the forum. You have to distinguish two scenarios: a) you have two or more bare-bones vanilla Linux hosts where you map the same LUN, and use that LUN as if it was a local disk without any coordination b) you have cluster...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread NVME-of multipath inconsistency.
    Hi @Freddy Lege , We have seen no issues in our testing with PVE 9.2 and Kernel 7. Perhaps you can expand with more details, i.e.: - storage vendor you are using - exact PVE versions (pveversion / pveversion -v - how the connections were...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @barndoor101, There is no reason for a single node outage to take out a 5 node healthy cluster. As such, there is no procedure to: You need to examine logs and system state of each surviving node in the cluster. There must be a secondary...
  • bbgeek17
    Yes, you'd need to create a VM config manually across the clusters. Note that sharing configuration and disks across clusters is not something that is officially supported, or tested. It should work with immutable type of VM such as a Template...
  • bbgeek17
    This topic has been brought up multiple times in the forum, but I do not recall if there was a good outcome, at this moment. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @etfz , As far as I know there is no network or storage monitor integrated into default PVE cluster distribution. You will need to create your own. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    You can use Rescue Boot from the installation media and inspect the situation. https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-pve-installation.html#installation_installer
  • bbgeek17
    The unattended upgrades often lead to these types of posts in a forum: I had a power outage, all my host rebooted and now something is not working. I have not changed a thing! Oh there was a Kernel and QEMU and "something" upgrade a month ago...
  • bbgeek17
    This article may be of some help: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @jtru , what are the exact issues are you trying to solve? Can you elaborate what are the remaining parts for you? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    What about physical console? It's possible that you ran out of space. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @Rice and Soy Sauce , Since you mentioned "some hiccups" it would have been great if you provided some information on what those were. Any log outputs from the upgrade time would help as well. In general, given potential upgrade issues, this...
  • bbgeek17
    You are welcome to file a feature request to overload GUI/CLI with this particular functionality. Given that you have options to achieve your goal already - be realistic about the priority of this request. The license providers may disagree with...
  • bbgeek17
    If your current systems are working to your satisfaction, perhaps you should not rush into an upgrade. If you are upgrading to a new family of the hypervisor (8 to 9) be aware that the 9 is likely not explicitly tested with 6.x Kernel any more...
  • bbgeek17
    You can/should change Proxmox to use a static IP and place it on such network in HyperV that allows it. There is also some discussion here, albeit it may be outdated...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @gkovacs , you can pin a specific Kernel version: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Host_Bootloader#sysboot_kernel_pin Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Great, you can mark the thread as solved by editing the first message and selecting the appropriate subject prefix. This will help others as they search the forum. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...