bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI multipathing.
    If you feel that is best - go for it. You may want to read through this guide while waiting for package install: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread iSCSI multipathing.
    Hi @bpizzuti , There is really nothing anyone can suggest because there is no useful information in your post. The only suggestions I have - open your favorite LLM and follow its prompts in gathering the data. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    It was never 9090. Unless you use some 3rd party scripts/tools/modifications/proxy https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#_accessing_the_management_interface_post_installation Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared...
  • bbgeek17
    Port 8006 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    You are welcome. You can update the initial thread message's subject with a SOLVED dropdown. It helps in keeping the forum tidy. cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    When a system has gone through multiple configuration changes, it can be difficult to reconstruct exactly how it transitioned from one state to another. Changes made along the way, configuration files that may have been overwritten or not picked...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @marowens , welcome to the forum. First thing - do everyone a favor and do not use screenshots, or avoid them if at all possible. Pasting basic text and using CODE tags from the edit box menu is much easier to read. Second, did you install...
  • bbgeek17
    You may be interested in reviewing this article: https://kb.blockbridge.com/technote/proxmox-lvm-shared-storage/ While it uses iSCSI as the underlying connectivity protocol, all the higher layer concepts apply to your situation. Blockbridge ...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 reacted to helio's post in the thread apt update error with Like Like.
    Will buy 2 pairs. THANK YOU
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread apt update error.
    You fixed one issue, but missed the second repository entry. Your security repository is still pointing to `http://deb.debian.org/debian/`. The Debian security repository uses a different URI. Change the second URIs: line to: URIs...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread apt update error.
    Compare your file with what I provided line by line. Do you see the difference in the URI: line? Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread apt update error.
    this file needs fixing. Check its context, in standard installation it should be what I have provided. You can also save existing file's back - its a good practice: cp /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.sources /tmp/debian.sources.bak...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread apt update error.
    Hello @hello. Your repos have wrong URL in them, its not www.debian.org, it is deb.debian.org This will show where the errors are: grep -RniE 'www\.debian\.org|debian\.org' /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ This is what you should...
  • bbgeek17
    “You’re absolutely right to push back here. The word ‘probably’ in my previous answer was doing load-bearing work it was never certified for.” --claude Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    there are simply no guarantees on the kernel side that would make this safe, even with such a hook added. the activation of the pool on two nodes is already problematic in itself, and is a prerequisite for live migrations, so this cannot work...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread CVE-2026-98432 in Proxmox VE.
    7.0.14-24 is before 7.0.14-25, so I believe the answer to your question is "no". That said, I can be mistaken - so do check! If you have support subscription - they are the best people to confirm. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread CVE-2026-98432 in Proxmox VE.
    The fix is already in the current PVE kernel. Here's the chain: 1. Upstream fix ("ipv4: free inet_opt and ireq_opt after an RCU grace period")...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread CVE-2026-98432 in Proxmox VE.
    Hi @hannsr Yes, the Proxmox kernel is affected, but the fix is already included in the current kernels. The upstream fix is a small change in the IPv4 code (net/ipv4/af_inet.c and net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c). It reached the Ubuntu 7.0.0-43 kernel...
  • bbgeek17
    You should review this and following sections: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#ha_manager_node_maintenance Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @QuentinCh , welcome to the forum. Yes, you can use Ceph with size=1 and min_size=1. All four PVE nodes can access the Ceph storage over the network, even if only two nodes have disks for OSDs. However, size=1 provides no data redundancy, so...