bbgeek17's latest activity

  • bbgeek17
    Perhaps check this thread and the one referred in it: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/solved-proxmox-8-0-rescue-boot-help-needed.132978/ Creating a vanilla Debian/Ubuntu rescue disk is also an option. There is nothing PVE specific in what you...
  • bbgeek17
    One other point - the output from "lsscsi" on server1 does not actually show two devices which would indicate a healthy multipath device. Your "multipath -ll" also shows single path. So although you now have an "mpath" device it may actually be...
  • bbgeek17
    7.0 already contained the relevant commit upstream prior to it being cut: https://git.kernel.org/linus/a664bf3d603dc3bdcf9ae47cc21e0daec706d7a5 (7.0-rc7)
  • bbgeek17
    It would be incorrect to say that 7.0 "is not affected". It is affected but patches have been released. Including in the PVE distribution. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    We've been running our CI/CD for PVE9 with Kernel 7 since it was announced on the forum and have not had any issues. Note that our testing is targeted at storage functionality of the PVE. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared...
  • bbgeek17
    As it seems relevant here: We've been running our CI/CD for PVE9 with Kernel 7 since it was announced on the forum and have not had any issues. Note that our testing is targeted at storage rather than networking functionality of the PVE. Cheers...
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread [SOLVED] 2 Nodes and ISCSI Storage with Like Like.
    Since you didn't mentioned it: Do you have a qdevice in your cluster? Otherwise you might run into a split-brain-situation: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Cluster_Manager#_corosync_external_vote_support
  • bbgeek17
    Proxmox is based on Debian Linux with a curated Ubuntu Kernel. The LVM is part of standard Linux implementation. There are no Proxmox-specific steps when dealing with LVM. Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox -...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @iPanini , The qcow you found is likely NOT your VM. It seems to be located in your home directory. More than likely it is the installation download you got originally. The 2003 date of the file is another confirmation. The LVM error message...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @ASM-Network , thank you for reporting back. I am glad to hear your issue is resolved. You can mark this thread as "SOLVED" by editing the first post and selecting the appropriate prefix from the subject dropdown. This helps in keeping the...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @zero-skill, welcome to the forum. This has been covered a few times, for example: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/joining-unlicensed-pve-node-to-cluster-that-is-licensed-what-happens.108160/post-465204 Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    You did not configure your system properly. As you noted, you are not using shared storage functionality. There is no value in continuing to troubleshoot beyond this discovery. Your best course of action is to: remove all VMs remove all storage...
  • bbgeek17
    I think it would help if you share the /etc/pve/storage.cfg as well as "qm config [id]" output of the "old" and "new" VM. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Congrats on the new release! Great to see new security functionality! Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    Hi @angry_beaver , If I understood you correctly, you need to enable this attribute: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#:~:text=remote%20iSCSI%20server.-,saferemove,-Called%20%22Wipe%20Removed Blockbridge : Ultra low latency...
  • bbgeek17
    As you can see in your output, server 2 does not see a Fujitsu device. This is most likely a zoning issue in Fujitsu. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox
  • bbgeek17
    bbgeek17 replied to the thread vmxnet3 mtu problem.
    Hi @ofry770 , welcome to the forum. In my experience with running nested ESXi in KVM/Openstack - the driver handling the vmxnet3 type adapter is intentionally limited by VMware in MTU handling. In fact the behavior varies across various patch...
  • bbgeek17
    Please use CODE tags, available in the edit box menu. It makes reading large configuration blocks easier. Before Multipath can form, the server needs to see raw block devices. Those should be listed via: lsblk lsscsi Are the outputs the same...
  • bbgeek17
    Hi Stefan, the most likely reason is that the 2nd server is not configured properly in one way or the other. However, that is based only on your brief report. If you provide some system information from both servers, perhaps a better suggestion...
  • bbgeek17
    There may be a time limit. It has been quiet a while since your original post. Cheers Blockbridge : Ultra low latency all-NVME shared storage for Proxmox - https://www.blockbridge.com/proxmox