alexskysilk's latest activity
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.right; so logically the body responsible for the decision is elsewhere (QEMU.) directory support still works and requires no support from PVE anyway. If the QEMU storage backend serves no additional utility, then what is the actual request for?
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread how to set quorum 3 on 6 nodes cluster ?.In order for it to be a true quorum provider, it has to be accessible to all nodes but NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED at either site. The whole point is should one of the sites drop, the quorum provider is not affected.
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.Not sure what the purpose of that statement serves on the proxmox forums. Probably should direct it to the QEMU devs.
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] One node cant access NAS shared storage.please post the contents of /etc/network/interfaces /etc/pve/storage.cfg dmesg | grep /path/to/nfsmount
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] linux-tools-common?.It means that this package is included in ubuntu distributions. Proxmox uses debian as its parent distribution, not ubuntu. it also means that its not an actual package, its a collection of applications which you can install by yourself, like...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Cómo lo soluciono.vea aqui: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Certificate_Management pero la version corta: rm /etc/pve/pve-root-ca.pem rm /etc/pve/local/pve-ssl.key rm /etc/pve/local/pve-ssl.pem openssl genrsa -out ca.key 2048 openssl req -x509 -new -nodes -key...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] linux-tools-common?.linux-tools-common is an ubuntu metapackage. Just install whatever utilities you are actually looking for.
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Glusterfs is still maintained. Please don't drop support!.I read through the chain, and I dont really understand what everyone is arguing about. Yes. ceph requires a minimum configuration (network topology, OSD count, etc) before its performant. this the is the wrong question to ask. whether someone...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot Install Proxmox on T610 Poweredge with H700 PERC card.Thats an observable fact :) but when you say It is explicitly a different message; I believe you come from a genuine place and want to help people- please expound on WHAT you feel is the risk is here. I think that would settle both your point...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot Install Proxmox on T610 Poweredge with H700 PERC card.lets put things in perspective. OP wants to run pve on a 15 year old server. it is clearly NOT for production use. what, exactly, do you suppose any such "risk" actually entails?! regardless of the NUMBER of kernels released since, NONE of them...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] Cannot Install Proxmox on T610 Poweredge with H700 PERC card.There are multiple documented issues with modern Kernels (>6.2) with LSI based controllers on older (pre Haswell) platforms, stemming from bios mapping issues- older kernels were much more foregiving. You can try to shoehorn their firmware into...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Migrating from read-only file system.In that case, all you need is the lxc config files (/etc/pve/lxc/*.conf.) simply copy those to your destination hypervisor, make sure the storage is mounted and the store presented in pvesm using the same name and away you go. Why is your root...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Proxmox with nfs 4.1 on Netapp All Flash.https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/netapp-solutions-virtualization/proxmox/proxmox-deploy-guidelines.html --edit with video: https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/netapp-solutions-virtualization/proxmox/proxmox-ontap-nfs.html#storage-administrator-tasks
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors.This is a great breakdown of your progress, and hitting that 90% threshold on CPU and network is a solid milestone. However, regarding the storage deficit (the 50% delta on Ceph vs. Bare Metal), I want to save you some cycles on the "further...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors.hmm. yes, I see your point. I am guilty of thinking of PVE as an infrastructure. I forget that many (most?) of its users are homelabbers. consider me chastised :)
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Significant IOPS Drop in Proxmox 9.1.9 VMs Compared to Other Hypervisors.True generally, untrue in the OPs testing matrix. LVM-thin introduces its own problems. Since it is of almost no benefit in a modern deployment (LVM thick for SAN, zfs/btrfs for local) I dont know why OP even bothered testing it.
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread [SOLVED] Ceph Public/Private And What Goes Over the network.Yes. For Kubernetes nodes to interact with Ceph directly (via RBD or CephFS), they need to be on the Ceph public network. Without that direct line of sight, the Kubernetes workers won't be able to map the block devices or mount the filesystems...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread pct list endless.a container in zombie state would do what you experience. use ps to find the process (it would be in a permanent 'D' state.) The good news is that the rest of your containers work normally and you can use pct commands to control them. the bad...
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread RAIDZ2 with 6x 480GB SSD only 1.35TB usable total.zfs list -t all df -h
-
Aalexskysilk replied to the thread Storage options for a (3) node cluster with local NVMe disks and 25G network..1. any storage back end should serve that stated requirement. be aware that meeting a performance spec defined as "decent" may have different meaning for different people. 2. 15k iops is doable. In your environment, lvm type will yield the best...