What does the performance from the host OS to your NAS look like? If you're having network troubles on the host, you will want to fix that before you complicate the issue by chasing down settings inside your VMs.
VM and the PVE/QEMU doesn't know the "Storage backend" (ZFS,Lvmthin,Ceph,QCOW2) neither if encrypted or not.
So backup of VM should be encrypted by itself , that's why exist backup encryption in PBS.
This is a working method.
I mounted the disk to another virtual machine and was able to access the files. For tasks where you rarely need to restore individual files, this is a viable option.
The sequence is as follows (in case anyone needs it)...
if NTFS filesystem has some weird things, like chdksk required
Map drive manually instead map from GUI can access data because different ntfs open source driver.
AFAIK :
PVE backend for VM is QEMU , backup starts VM (QEMU process) , even for offline VM,
to fully read VM's vDisk(s).
It's not really PBS thing , as PBS "only" receive data from PVE/QEMU,
then PBS discards data if it has already same data even...
The write amplification does also heavily comes from the consumer SSDs itself, so that despite the used filesystem, you will always have more wear and tear on consumer devices. I never noticed any write amplification on my enterprise SSDs, but...
Alright,
NFS, migration, ESXi, network - all of that is extraneous and not related to your problem.
It really boils down to this: you have a RAID-backed LVM group, and you’re not happy with its performance inside the VM. It didn’t get worse -...