Recent content by 4920441

  1. 4

    xfrm interface for cluster join (only as a POC)

    thanks for the "remote-migrate"-hint. I didn't know that, or have forgotten about it (Which comes first....;-) But the xfrm problem persists - I solved it by generating another vmbr device with another network and set up routing over the xfrm interface only. That works fine - and, while testing...
  2. 4

    xfrm interface for cluster join (only as a POC)

    Hi, I set up proxmox on a freshly installed debian 12 which works fine so far. Furthermore I set up strongwan with xfrm interfaces on the proxmox server and a transfer network between another proxmox server. The goal is, to join the proxmox server with the already working cluster on the...
  3. 4

    Created an erasure code pool in ceph , but cannot work with it in proxmox

    ...okay... that part is not working for me right now. I can see the pools but I always get an error when trying to create a container or vm ... 2025-03-26T22:06:15.287+0100 781d3ffff6c0 -1 librbd::image::CreateRequest: 0x594f70dee0f0 handle_add_image_to_directory: error adding image to...
  4. 4

    Created an erasure code pool in ceph , but cannot work with it in proxmox

    and how do you use this in proxmox without manually editing the config files afterwards?
  5. 4

    Spam Erkennung

    Also eine seperate rspamd instanz in einem extra Container/VM oder hast Du das irgendwie mit im pmg direkt eingebaut bekommen und auch so, das es nicht durch updates zerstört wird?
  6. 4

    Spam Erkennung

    ...ich mag es kaum sagen/schreiben: aber wie kann Sophos Central E-Mail oder Proofpoint das teilweise so viel besser machen? Nur weil man dort unmengen an Kohle ausgeben muss heisst das ja nicht das die Erkennungsrate durch mehr Kohle auch steigen kann. Und als so 'gut' empfinde ich weder...
  7. 4

    Spam Erkennung

    ....ich denke das war sarkastisch gemeint....
  8. 4

    Spam Erkennung

    ....überflüssig ist ein wenig sehr hart. Das denke ich ganz und garnicht. Die Spamerkennung selber ist noch nicht so weit fortgeschritten wie bei einigen anderen Herstellern und auch vielen Cloud Lösungen. Die Preise die letztere Aufrufen sind aber teilweise 1000x höher als PMG. Ich betreibe...
  9. 4

    Proxmox Backup Server disable Transport-Encryption for already secure network

    Yes, off course you do. but not directly from the internet, only by a dedicated management network, where strict access rules are implied. Okay... I am an older sysadmin myself, but it this Cloud-thingy taking of so drastically so closed networks aren't a thing any more for the youngsters...
  10. 4

    Proxmox Backup Server disable Transport-Encryption for already secure network

    Did you ever hear about something like an airgap configuration?
  11. 4

    Proxmox Backup Server disable Transport-Encryption for already secure network

    I doubt Russia has access in our datacentre internal only network. As I said, if it its in a public environment, sure, thats a problem, but there I would dare to use anything without authentication and encryption.
  12. 4

    Proxmox Backup Server disable Transport-Encryption for already secure network

    Hi, is there a way to make a feature request about this? As mentioned, we do have in all our datacentres a sepearate local backup network, and the performance (thus cpu use) would be way better without encryption in this case. I totally agree with you, If you don't have such infrastructure...
  13. 4

    Proxmox Backup Server disable Transport-Encryption for already secure network

    Hi, is it possible to disable the Transport Encryption for the Proxmox backup server when communicating with a client? Reason for this is, that my Backup server has a rather small CPU (Intel Atom 3xxx something) whicht is not very potent in decrypting, but is able to write to the disks...
  14. 4

    proxmox-backup-client on debian bullseye / bookworm

    Hi, I'd like to test the new option --change-detection-mode=metadata which seems to be introduced in Version 3.2.5. In the bookworm repository there is only Version 3.2.7 available which should work, but on bullseye there is only the 2.x branch available. Before I try to compile it...
  15. 4

    How to remove subscription widget ?

    Please keep the nagscreen! Its a really small price to pay for a homelab environment! And If you use it commercialy, the prices are so low (at least for now) every business shoult be able to afford at least a basic license to support the Proxmox Team at least a little bit! Keep up your great work!