Hello everyone.
Reading from PVE documentation, you are only supposed to use Thin LVM's when building a shared storage with DRBD9 in PVE 4.2.
However, if you read here, http://www.drbd.org/en/doc/users-guide-90/s-drbdmanage-storage-plugins, it seems like the lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv and lvm_thinpool.LvmThinPool plugins (which the current implementation in PVE use) are still considered "usafe" by the LINBIT guys. Sure enough, they say "Some kernel versions have bugs re Thin LVs, destroying data". Does this mean I'm risking data corruption?
If so, using drbdmanage.storage.lvm.Lvm as plugin will change anything?
Thank you.
Reading from PVE documentation, you are only supposed to use Thin LVM's when building a shared storage with DRBD9 in PVE 4.2.
However, if you read here, http://www.drbd.org/en/doc/users-guide-90/s-drbdmanage-storage-plugins, it seems like the lvm_thinlv.LvmThinLv and lvm_thinpool.LvmThinPool plugins (which the current implementation in PVE use) are still considered "usafe" by the LINBIT guys. Sure enough, they say "Some kernel versions have bugs re Thin LVs, destroying data". Does this mean I'm risking data corruption?
If so, using drbdmanage.storage.lvm.Lvm as plugin will change anything?
Thank you.