Search results

  1. D

    [SOLVED] Trouble exiting LXC

    Yes, that does work as well. Thanks, you're a star!
  2. D

    [SOLVED] Trouble exiting LXC

    ices2 does not use systemd setsid gave the same result, however nohup does work! Thank you very much for your input :cool: One final question. Any idea why this has only been an issue with LXC? I have pretty much the exact same setup running on an Azure instance and have never had any...
  3. D

    [SOLVED] Trouble exiting LXC

    Thanks for getting back. I'm getting the same results:
  4. D

    [SOLVED] Trouble exiting LXC

    Occasionally I'm having issues when trying to exit CTs that I've used pct enter to enter. I usually use ctrl-d to exit but I've found that typing exit gives the same result. I have cloned one of the CTs to 100 and am using to test this. When I exit the terminal hangs as in the image below...
  5. D

    [SOLVED] pve-zsync stuck

    That's the one. Thanks. Any news on when a fix will be stable?
  6. D

    [SOLVED] pve-zsync stuck

    ps -ef|grep -i defunct root 5911 25477 0 13:36 pts/10 00:00:00 grep -i defunct ps -edalf |grep " Z " 0 S root 6531 25477 0 80 0 - 3197 pipe_w 13:36 pts/10 00:00:00 grep Z
  7. D

    [SOLVED] pve-zsync stuck

    pve-zsync seems to have got stuck last night pve-zsync list SOURCE NAME STATE LAST SYNC TYPE CON 1000 1000 ok 2018-09-11_22:32:48 lxc ssh 1001 1001 ok...
  8. D

    [SOLVED] pve-zsync and snapshot backups on zfs

    Thanks for getting back Is this true for a zvol on both sides of pve-zsync? ie Can I also take a snapshot of the receive side without the pve-zsync snapshots clashing?
  9. D

    [SOLVED] pve-zsync and snapshot backups on zfs

    If I have pve-zsync running every 15 minutes using, for example, --maxsnap 2 and take a snapshot backup that takes 6 hours will the snapshot created by the backup interfere with the removal of pve-zsync snapshots? Do I need to pve-zsync disable in this situation?
  10. D

    [SOLVED] LXC swap incorrect

    My containers are not obeying their allocated swap. For example container 111 has been allocated 128MB swap. arch: amd64 cores: 1 cpulimit: 1 cpuunits: 100 hostname: XXX memory: 2048 net0: name=eth0,bridge=vmbr0,gw=10.0.0.1,hwaddr=36:1F:BC:1B:78:47,ip=10.0.0.111/32,type=veth ostype: ubuntu...
  11. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    Thank for this guys. One last thing, lxc.environment in /var/lib/lxc/N/config resets the the LXC is restarted. Is there a way to make it permanent? Can it be set in /etc/lxc/default.conf or should it be added to /etc/pve/lxc/N.conf?
  12. D

    Proxmox VE is 10 years old!

    Happy Birthday, keep up the good work!! :)
  13. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    I am running nano after pct enter N but the same is true when using pct exec I think you've found the problem. If I do TERM=xterm-256color inside LXC I get the expected result when I do nano +3 text.txt How is it possible to permanently alter TERM?
  14. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    Proxmox VE GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) 14.04 LXC GNU bash, version 4.3.11(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) 14.04 metal GNU bash, version 4.3.11(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) EDIT: nano is the exact same version on metal as LXC: GNU nano version 2.2.6...
  15. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    I have 14.04.5 running on metal here. Nano doesn't have this problem, nano +3 text.txt opens on the 3rd line. So it seems to me that it's LXC that is causing this
  16. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    This only became a problem in the last couple of weeks
  17. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    pveversion -v posted here LCX is running
  18. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    apt-get purge nano && apt-get install nano whereis nano nano: /bin/nano /usr/bin/nano /usr/bin/X11/nano /usr/share/nano /usr/share/man/man1/nano.1.gz less /bin/nano "/bin/nano" may be a binary file. See it anyway? It's definitely a binary file! ls -lah /usr/bin/nano lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9...
  19. D

    [SOLVED] nano odd behaviour in LXC

    Anyone else have any ideas? As I mentioned before nano thing isn't a massive problem in itself but I am concerned about what else might not be functioning as it should. Nano worked fine up until a week or two ago.

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!