Search results

  1. M

    5.3 - Mismatch of SMART info on dual NVME system

    @dcsapak I've created bug report #2020 for the SMART information in the GUI and bug report #2021 for the block id. For the SMART values, if I use the namespace part for the toshiba nvme1n1 I can't get the SMART info, only when using the controller nvme0 I can get the correct SMART info, the...
  2. M

    5.3 - Mismatch of SMART info on dual NVME system

    Sure, I'll open a bug report. Is it sufficient if I copy the contents of both posts? Do you happen to have an idea what is going on with the mapping between controller and block device. I would expect that nvme0 has nvme0n1 as block device.
  3. M

    5.3 - Mismatch of SMART info on dual NVME system

    I've checked and it doesn't match the interface for the SMART Values. So general info on "Disks" tab is correct but when requesting the SMART Values the values are from the other NVME Drive. nvme0n1: root@proxmox01:~# smartctl -a /dev/nvme0n1 smartctl 6.6 2016-05-31 r4324...
  4. M

    5.3 - Mismatch of SMART info on dual NVME system

    Hello, I found something strange in regards to SMART info retrieved from my proxmox install. I have 2 NVME Drives: 1x Toshiba RC-100 240 GB as boot drive with LVM 1x Samsung 970 Evor 1TB as ZFS drive When I looked at the smart values the values seemed strange, only 20GB written for the...

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!