Search results

  1. B

    Proxmox VE 5.1 released!

    Are we gonna get to try kernel 4.14 in place of 4.13 to see if the bsod bugs are fixed there?
  2. B

    Blue screen with 5.1

    understood, why choose kvm64 and not qemu64 then?
  3. B

    Blue screen with 5.1

    i dont know if this helps but i had similar issues with 5.0 (4.10 kernel) when i used cputype=default(kvm64) after changing it to cputype=host... no further issues. i didnt do kernel testing and so forth. is there any downside using cputype=host?
  4. B

    ProxMox 5.1 ETA?

    well looking at past release dates, they seem to release a new minor version every 3-5 months
  5. B

    Allflash Ceph

    The reason i believe is the 1 job speed as illustrated in the job blog above. I'd be satisfied with 250MB/sec for 1 job speeds if its more cost effective. I think Samsung 960 PRO and beyond should do slightly better although there are no tests out there so its only an assumption.
  6. B

    Allflash Ceph

    How's Samsung 960 PRO though in terms of value for money? I know it doesn't give optimal performance but if its half i suppose its good enough.

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!