Oh boy, again...
Finally having some conclusions , but not a real solution yet.
1. I was running the 5.1 machine version ( due to old times used vms and templates ). Once I have upgraded the machine version to 8.1 and reinstalled latest virtio drivers, the token appeared on the vm, but with...
Oh boy...
root@ubuntu:~# lsusb
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0529:0620 Aladdin Knowledge Systems Token JC
Bus 003...
I just dont have any luck with this, something I am missing here...
I've added the token as per below screenshot:
lsusb
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0624:0249...
Thank you for the help !
I will do a hypervisor reboot in a couple of hours, also perform an update.
Would the "intel_iommu=on" or "iommu=pt" parameters still needed in my case ?
I suspect the device is usb 1.1 - will confirm asap, once I'll check this. However, may it be a source of the issue...
Thank you @leesteken . You are right, I have to admit I do have a bit of a confusion....
However, my target is to only passthrough either a single port or the device id itself. So that this dongle to be directly presented to the windows vm.
Besides the required configuration for usb device...
Hello Guys,
I am really scratching my head trying to passthrough an usb device to a Windows10 vm.
The device is a "Gemalto SafeNet eToken" containing a certificate for e-signing.
The device has been detected and was appearing at "lsusb", also I have configured:
cat /etc/default/grub | grep...
Hello,
Also another two questions I would have regarding the commercial support.
On the Subscription Agreement i can see ( we are only referring to the premium subscription ):
"The enterprise support team is available on Austrian business days between 7:00 to 17:00 (CET/CEST) - (7 a.m. to 5...
Hello,
I would have a question regarding the subscriptions support coverage.
Are the subscriptions covering support for the CEPH storage - in case of HCI deployments ( ceph deployed natively from PVE and running on the same PVE nodes ) ?
Thank you !
Thank you so much for your answer.
I am still not sure what would it be the exact procedure. If we look into the datastore, we can see:
# ls -la
drwxr-xr-x 4 backup backup 82 Nov 15 00:07 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 34 Jul 13 13:30 ..
drwxr-x--- 65538 backup backup 1069056...
Hello everyone,
I have the following setup:
1. Local PVE is doing backups on local PBS
2. Local PBS is syncing the datastore to Remote PBS over the internet.
My question is:
In case of a total disaster on the "local" site, it would be more time cost effective:
1. Export remote PBS's vm backup...
Thank you so much for replies, at least I am now confident that I have configured as per your advices.
I works well for the minute, and it does the job.
Looking forward for next features to be introduced.
Nice team, nice work, nice job !
Cheers,
Leo
Hi,
I have just tried to configure two remote pbs synking to a central pbs and i am having some issues.
On the central pbs I only have one block drive ( one raid 1 array )
I have added the array as a disk ( without adding it as a datastore ) so the mountpoint looks:
device...
Hello everyone,
I have tryed to downgrade ceph client on a cluster member pve node, but it seems not possible. I've ended up with uninstalling pve core packages, and when i've re-installed them, v14 ceph client was added back, so got me in the same situation.
Any thoughts about procedure to...
Hi,
Desperately looking for a solution, so I have reistalled a fresh single node with the latest iso image.
Result was having running:
pveversion
pve-manager/6.3-2/22f57405 (running kernel: 5.4.73-1-pve)
ceph -v
ceph version 12.2.11 (26dc3775efc7bb286a1d6d66faee0ba30ea23eee) luminous (stable)...
Ok,
So i have followed same path as we previously used for the servers with issues.
1. Installed pve 6.0.1 on a single node.
2. Upgraded to latest 6.3-3 && reboot
- noticed that still ceph client v12 is still present
3. Added external ceph cluster
- everything is fine, vms disks are listed
4...
No firewall between, and also iptables on ceph nodes are not blocking anything.
Was is a bit disruptive is that ceph can be interogated about its usage, but it cannot show information regarding pool and pool content...
Tailing "/var/log/pveproxy/access.log" when selecting "external-ceph-rbd"...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.