Search results
-
D
Proxmox Cluster Upgrade from 6.4 to 7.3 (using Remote Ceph Storage)
Hello all, We are currently running a Proxmox cluster consisting of 12 nodes with PVE 6.4 (latest patches) and local ZFS storage. In the future, the PVE cluster will be fully connected using Ceph storage. To migrate the infrastructure to the new PVE version 7.3, we wanted to use our external...- dpl
- Thread
- from 6.4 proxmox cluster to 7.3 upgrade using remote ceph storage
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration
-
D
Extrem LANGSAMER Ceph Storage ab über 60% Auslastung ???
Wir haben einen "Labor" Ceph Object Storage, welcher aus einem 4x-Multinode-Server und den folgenden Node-Komponenten besteht: Pro Node: PVE Manager Version pve-manager/7.1-7/df5740ad Kernel Version Linux 5.13.19-2-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.13.19-4 (Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:10:09 +0100) 24 x Intel(R)...- dpl
- Thread
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Proxmox VE (Deutsch/German)
-
D
Extremely SLOW Ceph Storage from over 60% usage ???
We have a "Lab" Ceph Object Storage consisting of a 4x Multinode Server and the following Node components: Per Node: PVE Manager Version pve-manager/7.1-7/df5740ad Kernel Version Linux 5.13.19-2-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.13.19-4 (Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:10:09 +0100) 24 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5675 @...- dpl
- Thread
- active-directory ceph cephfs proxmox 7.1 samba slow performance
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration
-
D
Proxmox: mehrfach redundante (boot) EFI Partitionen
Hallo Community, wir hatten die letzten 5 Jahre unsere produktive Infrastruktur mit SmartOS (einem Illumos Kernel basierten Hypervisor) https://www.smartos.org/ betrieben und sind jetzt zu Proxmox gewechselt. Proxmox begeistert uns. Jedoch ist uns ein suboptimales Partitionierungsschema des...- dpl
- Thread
- boot efi multiple part proxmox proxmox-boot-tool
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Proxmox VE (Deutsch/German)