Search results

...check this out: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10575-PROBLEM-Two-USB-keys-(same-brand-model)-trying-to-be-forwarded-to-two-different-VM?p=59129#post59129

...thought you were using ZFS *inside* the VM and based on your mount point you gave away, that you were using "containers", AKA OpenVZ. Still not sure what ypour ZFS organisation is. For ZFS...you do not use a pool ("root" zfs-folder) directly...create ZFS folders instead. So if any process...

AFAIR there is a limited number/list of FS supported by OpenVZ-Containers....ZFS is definitely not on that list...IMHO you'll need to migrate to KVM for your VMs.

Yes, you can assign the physical CPU scheme to each VM...this only makes sense for a VM where the software/application running inside can make use of more than one core, of course ;) Also, there are settings for no. of sockets and no. of cores per socket...especially Windoze will be picky with...

..VMs will see virtual CPUs (sockets and cores). The scheduler will spread the available physical processing power between all VMs. If you have more more virtual cores running than what you have physically in the host, there is no technical problem. If all VMs run on high load, the total CPU...

...blacklist will only work for modules that are not built into the kernel image already. My guess is, AHCI is built in and not a module. ...don't know but maybe modalias is something useful here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Modalias

...deleted double post due to technical problems with forum

...deleted double post due to technical problems with forum

...not sure what your definition of the concept of "not seeing" the controller really is. Passthrough is enabled by software (with hardware support needed in the background). Even ESXi will need to "see" the device and then, somewhere down the startup sequence unbind the ESXI driver for that...

Well, maybe I am mistaken for the term public service, but opening ports to the internet is making your installation a public service indeed, I'd say ;-) ..nevermind, I take it that you don't seem to care

...set-up/use a VPN connection to do it properly and secure. maybe your router already supports that. check for OpenVPN or IPSEC in its specs.

I don't have any experience with that controller specifically, but by the looks it is a rebranded LSI 9265-8i (see: http://www.lsi.com/products/storagecomponents/Pages/MegaRAIDSAS9265-8i.aspx). Looking into the readme of the latest LSI driver V5.3 for Debian lenny, it reads that support for that...

...well, if your VMs cannot reach each other but get out to the default route (internet), maybe if you're using different IPs at the outer range of /16 and /24, where they do match the same network?

...at first, I don't think that this is living in the right section of the forums, in order to get you help. Maybe you should ask the mods to move it to the appropriate section. ..second...are you sure about your subnets being used....graphics states "...1./16" and net-config code states...

Well, the whole point in this is to clone with DD on raw device level....no partitions and other layers come into play. You'll probably be needing the exact number of disks, same models and Firmware-version as in your RAID-Z pool to play it safe You can clone the disks one by one... Since you...

I don't think it'll work out that way. Your Raid-Z consists of a vdev, build from several physical disks. You maybe could clone it with dd onto another identical set of disks, outside of ZFS You could clone a ZFS Volume, since this represents the Blockdevice level of the vdev but I doubt your...

...I don't know...but if you didn't have snaps and did continue to use the volume in the meantime, your data is most likely gone anyways. There's a hint in the comments in the last link...AFAI understand that ZFS is doing some sort of "silent snaps"...maybe in order to be able to create a real...

Don't have snaps? ...here's something to read: http://mbruning.blogspot.de/2009/12/zfs-raidz-data-walk.html http://www.osdevcon.org/2008/files/osdevcon2008-max.pdf http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_forensics_scrollback_script...

so you deleted the VM disk with it, right?...and I gather you did NOT run ZFS snapshots on that said Raid-Z, or did you ?

+1 for the OCZ Vertex 4 The Samsung 830 model is a good alternative, too. Both have advanced, internal garbage collection, so you will not have to care about native TRIM support in the OS.