Search results

Thank you kindly. Will wait for it to hit no-sub unless that'll take a while. As it's a cherry-picked patch only, nothing else seems to have changed in the package, would it be a quick transfer there?

Just the super-fun stuff then? Thanks for clarifying, and for the patch link over to git. :) Took a quick peek at the repo, no -2 there yet - how long does your pipeline tend to take from the point of signed-off-patch?

Many thanks for the incoming patch - hoping to get this applied tonight (8pm here now) so we can get some re-shuffling done! Appreciate your quick movements here. When was the last time you had a segfault in the no-sub repo? (Obviously it's part of the pros/cons :) )

You're always welcome back, sweetie pie. Thanks for being so open with us, this way nothing can ever tear us apart again. ;) Oh nifty, so they got the Linux-based release out the door? Still on CORE over here, previously FreeNAS; would be great to get off BSD. Print that out, hang it on your...

Done! Looking forward to your update. # cat gdb.txt Continuing. Thread 1 "kvm" received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe. Thread 1 "kvm" received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe. Thread 1 "kvm" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. mirror_wait_on_conflicts (self=self@entry=0x0...

Okay, so leave it as-is for now, and then once it's faulted and the VM is certifiably dead, we Ctrl-C back to gdb then run thread apply all bt? From there it should deliver the trace contents into gdb.txt? Don't want to get any more key-strokes wrong. ;)

I've just got the code lines in a file, then executing with bash. Just went again, and it starts up then prompts - didn't do ctrl+c this time, where you're right about quit dropping out (stopping gdb). [New LWP 996813] [New LWP 996814] [New LWP 996815] [New LWP 996816] [New LWP 996817] [New...

Eek - just doing so has crashed the VM, only when executing the script with the right VM ID in-place. (Not what happened - Fabian points out that I used ctrl+c at the wrong point and killed the VM) It quickly paused to prompt about paging, replied 'c' and it then delivered this to gdb.txt...

Thanks for writing back Fabian, the journal reveals a segfault within KVM that appears to knock a bridge offline? Indeed it crashes on the source node during the migration - the VM never makes it across to the target node with this issue. Nov 12 11:19:31 node1 corosync[1391]: [KNET ] link...

Originally posted as a reply here: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/migration-fails-pve-6-2-12-query-migrate-failed.78954/post-429694 "We're seeing this as well, though without the overflow during RAM transmission. More info further into this reply." This problem was discovered following a...

We're seeing this as well, though without the overflow during RAM transmission. More info further into this reply. (SSD moved successfully as part of live migration ahead of this log excerpt, with VM427 running fine as always.) all 'mirror' jobs are ready 2021-11-12 11:20:25 starting...

Fantastic - thank you for confirming! :)

Hi there, The filtering system we moved to PMG from had the option to Whitelist and Send in a single click when in the per-mailbox Quarantine web viewer. Would it be possible for Proxmox to consider adding this into the Quarantine web GUI? It would avoid quite a few 2nd requests to the web...

Hi there, has everyone found upgrading to be uneventful? We're looking to move PMG up to 7.x ahead of PVE. Thank you!

Hi there, you can do this with the pmgsh functionality at command-line. You could go via the API as well if that's preferred. Have you read docs/manuals? For example: pmgsh help /config/domains --verbose pmgsh help /config/transport --verbose It looks like DKIM would be under pmgconfig...

Hi there, I replied on this thread, as we've been unable to find a way to "roll" the sending IPv4 address on our 2x PMG servers, but it hasn't seen any love yet. Should the servers have been standalone/single, it'd be easily done as we've verified. In a cluster, the system grabs the...

Was hoping to use the config templates for smtp_bind_address to override the sending address. Problem is confirmed via the docs with the below. Setting only allows to specify an IP, so can't use a common interface. "Modified templates from /etc/pmg/templates/ are automatically synced from the...

Following on from this, since the above screenshot we've deployed inbound filtering to PMG as well, which has reduced/improved the problem. It's earlier in the day relative to when we took the screenshot yesterday, though the percentages are far more sane. Very curious if anyone/Proxmox has...

To avoid creating a new thread, we're seeing the same negative Score 0 reporting figure, which has a knock-on to the other score percentages. Screenshot inline, which is from PMG 6.4-3. Did you ever get any further with potential "why"s? We've seen some emails scored negatively. Hoping to...

Hi Stoiko, When using the templates, do we need to carry the entire template across to update a single variable? ie. Could we just specify the variable in need of override in /etc/pmg/templates/x.y or does the entire template need to be brought over?