Search results

i also faced the issue on my cluster, but i didnt figure it out untill i saw the post, as i migrated one of the LXC's to a node which apparently had binutils already installed ( even tho i do try to take good care of keeping package-installations all in sync on the nodes). But as said, this is...

You deal with it in the same way as you would do when running VM's. Nothing different in approach other then that both a/the wordpress box and the database-box are LXC instead of VM's.

just my opinion,... Resource control for something like a Wordpress box/site is better done not creating them as a full VM, but as a LXC container. i am running like 12 LXC container on Rockylinux 8.6 ( base template deployed, configured further via Ansible, and have not yet had issues in...

Hi all, Seeking an explanation to why LXC containers popping up in Check-MK monitoring after x time regarding shared memory. The only solution to get rid of the notification in Check_MK monitoring for now is to just bluntly reboot the container. What i am after is an understanding as to what...

I understand your concern in regards of an action in the *very dangerous* categories. Do not want 'root@pam' execute and to be shown in a/the log, but my federated user which is a 1:1 relation to a person in a/the team .. So for auditing purposes would like to see no root@pam - executed actions.

Situation: OIDC correctly setup OIDC user is part of Administrators - group, with the correct rights. change LXC options ( ie. nesting/Fuse tick if unticked) Result: Is this by design? - in need of explanation here ... .. i mean i explicitly went for a federative method so i have control...

For reference, my setup of the cluster was documented in another Forum post : [TUTORIAL] PVE 7.x Cluster Setup of shared LVM/LV with MSA2040 SAS [partial howto] So do keep in mind that what i a doing in my playbook(s) is aimed at keeping my (system-)setup coherant. Next to that, i have one...

To add to that, you will even be able to transfer VM's/LXC's between the managed (cluster-)nodes. Just be aware that as you do not have shared storage it will mean when you transfer a box it will shutdown, and then gets sent over the wire, and when sent will be available on the other box. Prior...

@ednxzu I know its not as TS is after but i do have a set of playbooks to set my ProxMox env to how i want/need it. Remember, i'm sort of running an exotic env with specific demands, and its absolutely not optimised in regards of tasks, but it works. Happy to share it tho. - Glowsome

Wait, what ... first you are asking about 7.2, and now you are asking about 6.2 ? - you have not yet given any details regarding your first setup ( except the mention you changed something in the '/usr/share/perl5/PVE/API2/OpenId.pm' - file without letting us in on what exactly you have...

When Multipath was introduced (with new servers rotated in) it was configured correctly since start. On the old servers no Multipath was present and servers only had 1 connection to the storage. I distinctly remember also seeing same behaviour back then, but as said since i created the post and...

@m Expectation is to see the correct amount of storage being offered to PVE instead of the now (seemingly) doubled amount displayed. If you look at the LVM-screenie/view and calculate all space together you get to about 22TB , but was seeing 44TB total displayed on the Dashboard. However...

In my setup i have a 4-node cluster with shared SAS-Storage configured with Multipath. When i look at the Datacenter-> Summary report i see alot more storage which is actually available being calculated. As the usage of 'local' storage (in any way) within a cluster when having shared storage...

@Arakmar thankyou for clarifying it to me, i managed to solve my issue with your information :)

As i have not found any means to further debug or resolve this i will be planning on replacing this box. However that will have quite the impact, as it is running some vital roles - making it quite painfull to implement changes on this box.

in regards of Ansible - and running it actively on a 4-node cluster for management/keeping settings in check i do not really see an issue. this is excluding the absence of the needs-reboot -detection (as currently not implemented/present in proxomox - specified in reboot required ) As you are...

i had similar flukes on installing new boxes on my cluster due to not having my documentation in order. Just a suggestion - mark your post/thread as [solved] - topic so others wont look into this as if its still not solved :)

Still no closer to a solve on my end.. Anyone out there who might have found a solution ti this behaviour ?

Sorry to (re-)activate this thread, but i am also facing this issue. As to the above provided solution i am a bit cautioned by introducing wildcards. My situation : - LXC console (across the cluster) works fine. - VM console only works when i am on the GUI of the node the VM is on. -...