Search results

Networking stack is complex - adding additional layer for this would block the oportuninty of tuning in many ways. So I think I probbably use IOMMU instead of SRV-IO and not to use virtio as a bridge to network nic. OS: Proxmox 7.1 --> Debian 11

I will do tests between LXC and KVM with passthrough. I could do also (virtio vs passthrough) but You show me the way to simply simulate 100.000 connections with different src/dst ips....

@tom I plan not to use virtio nics because of performance (I need multiqueue and offload from my hw nic). So there is not a good idea to do that - i will use VirtIO nic for management nics.

I would like to make a router for a 10G+ bandwidth (BGP+QoS+Firewall). Of course I will passthrough the network cards inside to the VM/Container. What is better for that purpose: Container or Virtual machine?

I mean: Why the Nesting feature is not enabled for newly created containers? (and not why the "unprivileged container" option is set by default) :)

Yes that helps.

Why this isn't enabled by defaults? When creating container the "unprivileged container" option is set by default.

This causes login via SSH takes ~30sec.

I could only confirm the same issue.

Please see the attached image from earlier post.

Well some angel gave me (after sending a post) an answer - You need only to fsck unmounted EFI partition listed in /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids and run: pve-efiboot-tool refresh. Thats all.

What can I do with that: # dpkg --configure -a Setting up initramfs-tools (0.133+deb10u1) ... update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated) Setting up pve-kernel-5.4.78-2-pve (5.4.78-2) ... Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal...

Look inside the features in LXC Options - see attached screenshot

I opened FR at bug tracker allready after few commants here.

its still workaround.... Users need to do one click and forget about that thing.

Now I do migration by zfs send+ssh and copying config file... but that's smells like temporary solution ;-)

> based on my experience having hostnames in the storage names is a bad idea Why? It's not quite bad... In moniotoring software - If You got many storages there are distinguishable without aliases... > kind of gives it away: names of source and target storage must be identical. There should...

I use the newest Proxmox. I cannot migrate between nodes when the nodes has local-storages.

I tried to restore privileged to unprivileged container. Is it supported? If not how to convert one to another and vice versa.

This is not suitable for containers and pct command. How to do migration with one click instead of clicking backup&waiting&restore... ?