Search results

God bless you! After excluding /dev/sde from lvm.conf and rebuilding initramfs all is good as new. Thank you very much!

I was looking for how to do the rescan myself and this is how I've done it. I hope this helps someone. Rescan should be done on ALL nodes: pvs -o +tags multipath -ll LUN_name echo 1 >/sys/block/sdX/device/rescan echo 1 >/sys/block/sdY/device/rescan echo 1 >/sys/block/sdZ/device/rescan echo 1...

Hi, I have a PVE cluster where all nodes are connected to several SANs using multipath. However one PV in LVM complains, that it is using one of the paths instead of multipath device: [node5@15:35 ~]# pvdisplay WARNING: PV 0tO1MK-jzPE-WKj4-RBi6-Ev9t-4Yvf-jXgNGF on /dev/sde was already found on...

I haven't found how to mark this thread as solved, so please do so, or guide me. Thank you.

Thank you Stefan. Disabling memory hotplugging solved this. [unifi@16:09 ~]# free -h total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 2,0G 666M 1,2G 3,1M 143M 1,1G Swap: 3,0G 0B 3,0G...

Hello Stefan, [unifi@07:53 ~]# free -h total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 931M 840M 62M 272K 28M 6,7M Swap: 3,0G 2,2G 852M [unifi@07:53 ~]# Balooning is active, but I have...

HI, I have set up a VM with 2GiB of memory [node6@09:31 ~]# qm config 108|grep mem hotplug: disk,network,usb,memory,cpu memory: 2048 [node6@09:32 ~]# But the guest claims it has only 1GiB memory Handle 0x1000, DMI type 16, 23 bytes Physical Memory Array Location: Other Use...

I've finally found the cause. It was the firewalld. I have added the nfs service and rpc-bind service, but there is one more that needs to be added, and that's the mountd service. When added, it works well since then. firewall-cmd --zone work --add-service=nfs firewall-cmd --zone work...

Hello all, may be a noobish question, but I have a fire on the roof (metaphorically). We had a network issue, and all nodes stopped seeing each other at the same time. After we resolved the network issue, all cluster nodes seem to be on their own: # pvecm status Quorum information...

I'm still struggling to find a cause of this issue. Any advice is welcomed.

Noone knows how to help me with this? Please.

Hello all, I know this issue was covered several times on this forum, but my symptoms are a bit different. I've used NFS storage for a few months but, now the storage shows offline in Proxmox GUI. Although on 2 nodes out of three it is mounted and accessible when checked from command line. Here...

Success!!! Thank you a lot. You saved me. [root@node2]# pvecm add --force 1 node1 trying to aquire cfs lock 'file-corosync_conf' ... trying to aquire cfs lock 'file-corosync_conf' ... trying to aquire cfs lock 'file-corosync_conf' ... trying to aquire cfs lock 'file-corosync_conf' ... trying...

I am out of ideas now. On node2, there is no sign of it beeing in a cluster anywhere. Is there any way how to fool node1 for it to think that it is the only node in it's cluster? [root@node1]# cat corosync.conf logging { debug: off to_syslog: yes } nodelist { node { name: node2...

I have tired to reboot whole node. Corosync.conf doesn't exist on node2. [root@node2]# pvecm status Corosync config '/etc/pve/corosync.conf' does not exist - is this node part of a cluster? Cannot initialize CMAP service [root@node2]#

Thank you for your interest Wolfgang. I have managed to copy the key this way: [root@node1]# ls -l /root/.ssh/authorized_keys lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 júl 19 2017 /root/.ssh/authorized_keys -> /etc/pve/priv/authorized_keys [root@node1]# ls -l /etc/pve/priv/authorized_keys -r-------- 1 root...

[root@node1]# ssh-copy-id -o "HostKeyAlias=node2" 10.0.0.2 /usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: Source of key(s) to be installed: "/root/.ssh/id_rsa.pub" /usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: attempting to log in with the new key(s), to filter out any that are already installed /usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: 1 key(s)...

Ihave tried to add a node2 to newly created cluster on node1 which failed: [root@node2]# pvecm add node1 The authenticity of host 'node1 (10.0.0.1)' can't be established. ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:aRIk8xO64eUL5RVX7uxy5BlIeg6EjtqKc7KWnKLruQE. Are you sure you want to continue connecting...

Yes it is indeed misleading to me too. I thought the changes will be lost during updates. What is the warning supposed to tell?

I have the same question. Have you found an answer?