Search results

i'd be happy if things would calm down a little bit and if everybody continues try to help things getting fixed without being reproachfull. i have seen the discussion about ssh keys in bugzilla, but i have to admit, that it got a little bit too lengthy and obstinate for me. because of that i...

mhh, that's opensource and if your work doesn't get honoured, you can at least provide/maintain that patch "out of tree" for a while and be persistent pointing at it. if there are enough people who find it useful things will happen, if the patch is ready for inclusion. proxmox devs will have...

but none of these bugs is more then 4 years old? and if they were so serious, wouldn't here have been more complaints ? please be fair. proxmox team is putting their energy on the important/critical bugs. they do a good job imho. i'm also impatient sometimes when bugs not getting fixed or...

> I would have been more thankful if they did commit 5 lines of code to fix a 10 year old bug instead of > going around forums telling people all is good with the code what bug are we talking about here @tempacc346235 ?

>@RolandK I had this same happen again just yesterday with another staff member so what? you should really be thankful that there is so good support with so much transparency and such a good community and knowledgeable people. and that there are developer which directly listen to what customers...

nobody is perfect. i just had been come across this bug and retested with recent proxmox and then searched the forum if there is anybody hit by that. as it's more likely that somebody with this problem will search the forum then the bugzilla. i just want to make things transparent. this...

known problem , especially when backing up to remote storage: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2723

i'm sad that full system encryption is being discussed / asked for again and again when we don't even have complete backup encryption. which is low hanging fruit and should not be hard to implement. why does nobody ask for that ? https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4602...

in which log/unit exactly ?

where do you see this message?

there is a bugzilla report for this: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4816

https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/774

difficult one https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/774 fortunately, there is a bugticket @microsoft being opened in the meantime

mhhh, 3 clients with the same problem? they all reboot theirself, even when in bios? how often does that happen? did you ask in igel community / slack? i guess that's a better place.

>As I write this message with the Igel inside the BIOS screen so I could copy the version number, the machine restarted again without warning, so this time not even in linux. so , then this is a hardware problem. i don't think that you can get rid of this via update.

ok, i understand. thanks for explaining.

hello, is this failure to be expected ? the disks which are excluded from backup are temporary being pulled from the server, but i don't want to disable backup from this machine, as it would perhaps be forgotten to re-add it later on... INFO: starting new backup job: vzdump 101 102 103 104...

und die willst das dann interaktiv via desktop/gui nutzen oder als server laufen lassen, d.h. permenent als dienst? >Eine VM von Oracle habe ich nach Anleitung relativ problemlos zum laufen bekommen. eine VM ist eine virtuelle maschine. ich denke du meinst hier du hast eine VM auf Oracle...

was ist denn deine anforderung? was möchtest du tun ?

ich wollt nur ein wenig M$ Frust abkippen . aber daß selbst M$ empfiehlt nein eigenen, lokalen mailserver vorzuziehen, find ich schon nen klopper...