Search results

Ok, testing this just now and the problem is resolved. I'm certain that no resources were in my HA list the second time the problem occurred, however since then (and since both nodes have been rebooted) it's been stable so I think it must have been in an odd state that a reboot fixed. Thanks...

Thanks Aaron. I did consider a qdevice on a Pi - not gotten around to that. I was playing with HA with 1 VM. After the first time the unexpected reboot happened, I removed this test VM from the HA config before I patched/rebooted the second node, but the same still happened. To disable HA...

Hi. I have a 2 node 5.4 cluster - I know it's recommended for 3 nodes but I only have 2 servers. I don't need auto failover capabilities, just manual migration, config sync, etc. The cluster has been running for some time (6m+) and today I came across an issue when doing an upgrade (5.4-3 to...

Dang just noticed I had this in my apt.sources: deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pmg stretch pmg-no-subscription stretch instead of buster! A hang over from my 5.2 build docs I think. I'll correct and see if this fixes. Thanks, Richard

Hi. Here's from my 2 nodes: Node 1: root@scrub1:~# pmgversion -v proxmox-mailgateway: 6.0-1 (API: 6.0-4/c6dd64ec, running kernel: 5.0.21-1-pve) pmg-api: 6.0-4 pmg-gui: 2.0-4 pve-kernel-5.0: 6.0-7 pve-kernel-helper: 6.0-7 pve-kernel-5.0.21-1-pve: 5.0.21-1 libarchive-perl: 3.3.3-1...

TL;DR: It seems pmg-smtp-filter starts syncing correctly time-after-time once I manually send it a SIGUSR1 signal, but stops again after restart pmg-smtp-filter. Bug? I've been doing a lot of testing and it seems this issue is intermittent. Throughout all my earlier tests (before I wrote the...

Hi, I'm running the latest 6.0 (just did a dist-upgrade today) and I've noticed a problem where I modify the config on node 1, the config synchronizes to node 2 but is not applied until I restart pmg-smtp-filter. The particular changes I've been making are with the Mail Filter rules (adding...

Hi. I have 2 scenario's where I want PMG to treat a message as spam. 1. If the SpamAssassin score is >= 5 2. If my upstream filter has already prepended the subject with "SPAM" I have rules to accomplish this, and it works fine. However, the user whitelist isn't working as expected for me...

Hi Stoiko. We have had some cases where an attacker has sent emails pretending to be our CEO. I'm sure you're familiar - the email is sent to someone in finance stating that we must pay this overseas supplier urgently, etc etc. The emails we've seen employ two methods: Assume the CEO is "Joe...

Hi all, Is there a way to maintain some state between mail filter rules? I've had a look through pmg-smtp-filter and I can see that all actions get applied at the end after their conditions have been evaluated. What I want to achieve is an "impersonation" filter. My logic is : if...

I had a similar question. Seems SpamAssassin does the URI matching and the config is in /usr/share/spamassassin/25_uribl.cf. This requires the PMG setting pmg.spam.rbl_checks=1 (Configuration -> Spam Detector -> Options -> Use RBL checks = Yes)

Yes that's correct, it's a H700. Ok, interesting that it doesn't have a passthrough capability and thanks for pointing that out. So it would seem no matter what I will still need to create RAID arrays even if they're RAID0. I do currently monitor the SMART status of my drives (graph temp...

Hi all, I'm fairly new to ZFS and I'm after a bit of advice on the best config for my setup. I have some old-ish hardware, but it was right for my budget and I have plenty of spares to see me into the medium term future :- * Dell R510 * 12 magnetic drives - 10 x 15k SAS 600G, 2 x 7.2k 2TB *...

Ok, thanks for the quick reply. I'm actually pleased that I realised when writing my original post that the graph is actually correct, just showing bytes.

Hi, I'm a new user to Proxmox and am running PVE 5.4-3. Been testing for a while and now migrating my ESXi to PVE. One small thing - I noticed the network throughput graphs were wrong, like around 8-10 times less. Then I just realised, they're probably showing bytes rather than bits. Is...