Search results

I have a similar issue with you. I have installed in a ubuntu 24.04 softether vpn server and configured it via soft ether server manager from a win machine. While I have a successful connection with clients, speeds are another story, I also have a softether VPN server on an old dell optiplex...

Hey, thank you for your quick response. So just by installing chrony, part of it's installation process involves removing systemd-timesyncd (The following packages will be REMOVED: systemd-timesyncd) ?

Hi During the process of upgrading to proxmox 8 and running the script pve7to8, I got the result of the test script: INFO: Checking for supported & active NTP service.. WARN: systemd-timesyncd is not the best choice for time-keeping on servers, due to only applying updates on boot. While not...

Glad that it could help someone out.

I already know that software and tried to use it but for some reason couldnt, Also the supported list doesn t have the brand Tescom at all. Maybe there is an oem manufacturer that builds both Tescom and the other band I could use but this info is not for this site. Anyway I don t know though...

ahahaha we just bought it . Yeah I know better search next time.

True but I don t have any other way to communicate the host with the ups in case of occurred event s on the ups side. i ve found then following link How do I install the Linux library libc.so.6 but I don t know the implications of a solution like that would have in the near future or possible...

That is why I re-edited my post and added the outcome of dpkg -L libc6 in order something is missing there. So is there anything that can be done? NMC card is an SMPT WEB Pro 1.1 for a Tescom Prime Plus UPS and the manual refers a few lines about how to use a linux client.

Sorry for the title but I wanted to be as descriptive as I could be, in order someone else searches it in the future. So... upon my effort to install a cli program for proxmox in order to communicate with the SNMP card of the ups and gracefully shut down after all VMs do so, i tried to install...

Didn t know that ... I assumed it afterwards. Noted. Thank you for all your answers and quick response in general. So finally, how do I revent the command pvecm expected 1 back in normal mode? Except having all nodes online is there anything else I should do for the nodes I issued the...

oh... I meant shutted down - not online. I opened only one for other purpose and thought to update it first.

Hey that did the trick as you mentioned. I issued this on the first and third node and the stuck 98% went all along to finish line. So was my previous assumption right? I need all nodes active in order to update them? After the pvecm expected 1 how do I establish the normal behavior of quorum...

... thought that this was still on debate. Some noticed corruptions with upgrade but others with dist-upgrade . -get is deprecated and apt alone will do the job with the same results I think (at least I not using it). So in a cluster environment is there a specific way to run updates, than each...

See attached file even if I didn t notice anything weird there. pve-manager: Installed: 7.4-3 Candidate: 7.4-3 Version table: *** 7.4-3 500 500 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve bullseye/pve-no-subscription amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 7.3-6 500...

Hi I know that there were some similar issues since the earlier versions of proxmox about this matter and that is why I am going to include the outcome of those commands seen been asked for further assistance. Issue happened before 2 hours when I tried to update the first node. I let it...

year 2023.....proxmox version 7.3.6 and the same issue still goes on. Never used a CT up until now only VMs (I can confirm as well that backups to a remote nfs storage for Vms works not CTs though - so lzo works but not .zst backups), therefore I just noticed the problem with the denied...

... how did you end up with the assumption that I am using qcow2?

I wouldn t say the only, since yesterday finished with all the tests I wanted. Shared storage (even for backups and not for Vms themselves) solves many problems when you don t want to have a cluster of 3 (or 2 +1 voting guy) servers. I was able to backup VMs and their extra added storage to a...

Thank you for your quick reply Ok but NFS is the share protocol, on top or underneath that is zfs from Truenas (by the way scale - so Debian based). Possibly true but then again why do I have the option from GUI for each VM to back it up to the remote storage (nfs one) and still being able to...

Since the post isnt marked as solved I thought to jump in and ask a relevant question. I need to transfer all the VMs from one node to a another one (they are not part of a cluster). Maybe that transfer will happen again sometime in the near future. I am trying to find out all the conversions...