I think I confirmed the proxmox GUI syslog is reading from the journal
I added a line
echo 'hello' | systemd-cat
and it showed up in the GUI syslog.
it was also present in /var/log/syslog but there it did not show like it did in the GUI.
Indeed, thank you. However installing rasdaemon does not lead to being informed of events there in a similar manner like SMART events do.
My humble request is to have those be included out of the proxmox box so go speak
Thank you for this in depth explanation. I believe someone already mentioned something similar in passing earlier in this thread or another.
Was not the issue with this approach that it will not work when the laptop is connected to another network?, like in a hotel?
Although not happy with no one trying to chip in.
I can report now that syslog is now again being populated after reinstalling rsyslog
How was proxmox able to show syslog messages via the gui even though the file on disk was abandoned?
I am running proxmox 7.3.3. and I get SMART emails if something is going on with a HDD that needs attention out of the box. that's great.
But I also would like to be alterted of ECC memory and other RAS events.
Please consider a line in the syslog (when viewed from the web gui)...
wow, I am soo dislectlic. thank you for spotting that. that was indeed the problem.
I messed up an rsync operation once and never knew why. now I know I made a typo.
thanks again
yes, it was well clear in the script to apply the -e argument. but it did not help much. only around 500Mb or so was cleaned
and the digging process also gives me no leads ;(
du -h --max-depth=1 /
108G /LTdata
1.2T /LTData2
512 /media
144M /var
46M /dev
0 /sys
2.0K /mnt...
Did you ever dind the answer?
I am running into the same issue. I have a 128GB ssd zfs 2 way mirror. almost totally full.
Running the cleanup script did not help ;(
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
rpool/ROOT/pve-1 113G 109G 3.7G 97% /
ok Leesteken, I was under the impression that both Martin and Tom were Proxmox team members. From the same team that never addressed this specific questions of mine.
For the rest of us yes, all volunteer and such.
and before we start asking. 'what is your use case'please address my earlier questions related to the level of supprt regarding certain issues first then.
So my raising a concern about ZFS is NOT amongst those.
I really do not mean disrespect @martin
I respect and love proxmox and your team.
But I have asked onthis forum some times if something would be covered by getting a subscription.
The answer was always
radio silence.
So I am not sure what...
I am ringing the alarm bells.!!!
ZFS should not be idle. I mean it is a small price to pay when every 30 seconds the tiniest of IO operation if done. Maybe every 1 hour or what ever seems useful.
Doing no health checks is beyond my understanding at the moment. Can someone please shed some...
yes Fiona, A file create operation did trigger the pool to notice one of it's drives was missing.
Is this intended behavior from the source code? If so then I would like to follow up with the OpenZFS people that build the code to learn about the reasoning behind this decision. It might be...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.