Recent content by vuser1

  1. V

    Proxmox breaks DKIM signature

    My fault. This was my internal mailserver. I completely forgot that proxmox is another machine :) The patch works! Thank you very much!
  2. V

    Proxmox breaks DKIM signature

    It does not install on v2.6 mail:~# dpkg -i libmime-perl_5.420-2_all.deb dpkg - warning: downgrading libmime-perl from 5.427-1 to 5.420-2. dpkg: regarding libmime-perl_5.420-2_all.deb containing libmime-perl: libmime-tools-perl conflicts with libmime-perl (<< 5.425-2) libmime-perl...
  3. V

    Proxmox breaks DKIM signature

    Ha-ha, please tell this to gmail developers. And to roundcube as well. And - unbelievable - yahoo! That is the software you were asking about. Tell them that theirs online message composers are invalid. Force them to fix that. Now seriously. Electro-mail is angry beast. There are tons of...
  4. V

    Proxmox breaks DKIM signature

    Good question. I did more experiments. Gmail shows different boundary in "view source" of "Sent mail" folder. When it sends the message, it uses another boundary. Boundary is OK. The only problem is extra CRLF.
  5. V

    Proxmox breaks DKIM signature

    Proxmox is not compatible with DKIM/DomainKeys. This is message source, as seen from gmail "Sent mail": MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.78.157 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:33:17 +0800 Delivered-To: disabled01@gmail.com Message-ID...
  6. V

    Greylisting in proxmox 2.4

    Hi, I've just installed new 2.4 release as OpenVZ VM. Free version must be installed from scratch and I spent ~1 hour of installing and configing. Quite fast, isnt'it? I would like to say "Proxmox tream, thank you for REAL product!" Maybe someone (dietmar?) would like to explain changes...
  7. V

    High-ascii characters found in subject header SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM

    1) Why non-ascii characters in subject increase spam level? This does not make sense outside english-speaking countries. 2) You wrote that proxmox 'learn' and decrease weight of the rule SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM. How it can learn if users do not tell it that email is not spam? Users receive messages...
  8. V

    High-ascii characters found in subject header SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM

    Do I understand right that Proxmox Mail Gateway does not learn on-the-fly, according to my emails. Instead, it relies on statistical databases of built-in engines such as SpamAssassin?
  9. V

    High-ascii characters found in subject header SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM

    Interesting! Do you mean the system learns and will decrease weight of a rule? How does it work, how it understand that email was not spam?
  10. V

    High-ascii characters found in subject header SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM

    OK, I've did it. I hope it doesn't switch off useful tests like "too many spaces" or "message is HTML only". Anyway, do you think that non-ascii characters should not increase spam level?
  11. V

    High-ascii characters found in subject header SARE_HEAD_8BIT_SPAM

    I noticed that some normal emails are marked as SPAM. It happens not so often, but happens. Rule level is normal, not aggressive. Looks like there is an option to improve. See: Subject: SPAM: Регистрация в системе A1 Агрегатор raw subject: SPAM...
  12. V

    registering razor failed

    I see similar message in Proxmox 2.3 syslog: proxdaemon 885 registering razor failed: Unable to register without a valid razorhome or identity: at /usr/share/perl5/Proxmox/Utils.pm line 2775. Is this failure harmless?
Top Bottom
Back