UdoB's latest activity
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Fehler mit Docker Container nach Linux update with
Like.
Das ist keine "Entschärfung", sondern deaktiviert AppArmor komplett für den Container. Da kann ich auch meine Alarmanlage ausschalten, weil die ja immer so nervigen Lärm macht, wenn ich das Fenster statt der Tür nutze. Und nicht updaten ist auch... -
Neues lxc erstellen, darin die Anleitung auf https://www.postgresql.org/download/ für Version 16 durchführen, danach upgrade auf Version 17 und 18 wie unter https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/upgrading.html beschrieben testen. Ich habe...
-
UdoB reacted to uwka77's post in the thread [SOLVED] Netzwerk Konfiguration mit mehreren NICs with Like.
Hm, die Subnetzmaske ist auf jeden Fall 255.255.255.0, also /24, da habt ihr recht - danke für den Hinweis. Ich bin aber der Meinung, dass dieser Eintrag (address 192.168.77.253/24) bei der Installation des PE-Servers erstellt wurde. Beim...
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Suggestions for low cost HA production setup in small company with Like.
But then the backup server can be reached via ssh (without entering a password) from the cluster nodes. It's never a good thing that your backup can be accessed without authentification from the host you want to backup. There is however a good...
-
UdoB replied to the thread Suggestions for low cost HA production setup in small company.Yes, there are enough users running with three nodes an be happy. From my own experience in my homelab (last year) I learned that I want to be able to lose one node and have Cephs self healing capabilities do its job. To return to "everything's...
-
UdoB reacted to blanchet's post in the thread Suggestions for low cost HA production setup in small company with Like.
In your case, the best solution to cut the costs while keeping the system easy to manage is the solution B: 2 PVE nodes with ZFS replication + QDevice Notes: There are many tutorials for this setup on the web. You can run the...
-
UdoB reacted to VictorSTS's post in the thread Suggestions for low cost HA production setup in small company with Like.
If Ceph doesn't let you write is because some PG(s) don't have enough OSD to fulfill the size/min.size set on a pool. In a 3 host Ceph cluster, for that to happen you either have to: Lose 2 hosts: you won't have quorum neither on Ceph nor on PVE...
-
UdoB reacted to BobhWasatch's post in the thread [SOLVED] Advice Needed - Mass storage for archive with Like.
Just go with the stand-alone TrueNAS solution. Your life will be simpler.
-
UdoB reacted to bl1mp's post in the thread [SOLVED] Netzwerk Konfiguration mit mehreren NICs with Like.
Ja, da ist die Verbindung auf jeden Fall weg, weil das Gateway nicht mehr im eigenen Subnetz erreichbar ist. Schreibe hinter den / mal eine 24 also: auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 192.168.77.253/24 gateway 192.168.77.2...
-
UdoB reacted to RolandK's post in the thread proxmox bugzilla open tickets reduction effort - how to start/proceed? with Like.
hi, for a long time, i'm a little bit annoyed that there is quite a reasonable number (2724) of open , unresolved tickets in proxmox bugzilla at https://bugzilla.proxmox.com i don't want to blame proxmox team here, but my question is , how we...
-
UdoB replied to the thread [SOLVED] Netzwerk Konfiguration mit mehreren NICs.Das "/32" ist ungewöhnlich bis schlicht falsch. Vergleiche mal: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#_default_configuration_using_a_bridge
-
Hi I had to change the cable with new one (I used a cable that I bought some years ago...) as the ATA error comes back. With new cables, no error at boot. I will see with time. Since the memtest and the suppression of zram, no reboot without...
-
I hear you, but, that is not a reliable way to run TrueNAS. I have done it this way too in the past, but it does or can create issue for TruNAS because TrueNAS and by extension, zfs in TrueNAS doesn't own the devices. As a result, SMART doesn't...
-
UdoB reacted to Impact's post in the thread Ist das Upgrade von 8.4 auf 9 für produktives Homelab schon empfehlenswert? with Like.
Dafür gibt es replication via ZFS: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#chapter_pvesr Ich hatte bisher keine großen Probleme mit Debian Updates.
-
UdoB reacted to Johannes S's post in the thread Fehler mit Docker Container nach Linux update with Like.
Nun ja aus der ProxmoxVE Dokumentation zu lxcs: Es ist ein bekanntes Problem, dass bei größeren Updates docker-Container in LXC-Containern immer mal wieder kaputt gehen. Beide nutzen die gleichen Teile des Kernels, daher ist das im Endeffekt...
-
I would not recommend file based .raw disks: https://gist.github.com/Impact123/3dbd7e0ddaf47c5539708a9cbcaab9e3#why-not-use-local-for-guest-disks. Try pct fstrim 111 to "shrink" (probably won't work here) the disk and enable the metadata change...
-
UdoB reacted to prof343's post in the thread PBS is giving an error: TASK ERROR: marking used chunks failed: update atime failed for chunk/file with Like.
Thank you! The error disappeared after cleaning the deleted backups: find /var/proxmox/.chunks -type f -print0 | xargs -0 touch -d "-2 days" and the launch of Prune && GC Jobs
-
UdoB reacted to mr44er's post in the thread Ist das Upgrade von 8.4 auf 9 für produktives Homelab schon empfehlenswert? with Like.
Ich habe PVE noch nie instabil erlebt. Wenn was gesponnen hat, war immer Hardware schuld. Halte dich exakt an die Anleitung. Lasse das script pve8to9 --full davor laufen und nochmal bevor du die node jeweils rebootest. Lies auf...
-
UdoB reacted to cnupy's post in the thread Docker inside LXC (net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start error) with Like.
This is not a Docker issue — it's an AppArmor bug. See: https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/issues/4968 The package containerd.io=1.7.28-2 includes a critical vulnerability fix, so downgrading is strongly discouraged.
-
UdoB replied to the thread How to setup a Proxmox User with restricted access to only one node.See also https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/how-to-setup-a-proxmox-user-with-restricted-access-to-only-one-node.175436/