gurubert's latest activity
-
gurubert replied to the thread Ceph OSD crashes on I/O errors under light load with kernel 7.x - ssd via pcie adapter - FIXED with 6.17.13-7-pve.When even the kernel shows an IO error (in dmesg) it is time to replace the device. -
gurubert reacted to ggoller's post in the thread EVPN/SDN with BGP External Advertisement UI Limitations with
Like.
Hi! we're working on the VRF support for fabrics and the ability to leak into VRFs from other VRFs. We thought about adding a GUI for sysctls a while back, maybe you could create a feature request on our bugzilla (https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/)? -
gurubert replied to the thread How to update the web interface after changing hostname from terminal without reboot?.After changing the hostname a reboot is recommended as other services may also still use the old hostname.
-
gurubert reacted to spirit's post in the thread confused...CEPH delivering same performance on 100G as it did on 1G test with Like.
move your cluster_network ip on the 100Gb too. (cluster_network is used for osd replication when defined, so it's limiting your write speed) auto nic4_100G00 iface nic4_100G00 inet static address 10.180.194.211/24 address...
-
gurubert reacted to Neobin's post in the thread confused...CEPH delivering same performance on 100G as it did on 1G test with Like.
Either use only the public network or move the cluster network to one of the other 100G ports (on all nodes, of course). [0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/squid/rados/configuration/network-config-ref
-
Hello Tom, Thanks for the details. The interoperability between both technologies is much clearer to me now. We will assess if it makes sense to proceed with building the plugin to implement the integration
-
gurubert reacted to d.oishi's post in the thread Is it possible to have the second nic on my server to be used to access the GUI when the first nic goes down with Like.
Using two interfaces on the same subnet and assigning each of them an IP address is not a common way to provide redundancy. In general, bonding is used for this purpose. Here is an example configuration. If you want automatic failover, the...
-
gurubert reacted to William Edwards's post in the thread Sharing CephFS among VMs with a size limit with Like.
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephfs/quota/
-
gurubert reacted to t.lamprecht's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
Instead of complaining and just rejecting any responsibility for your own actions of installing an opt-in kernel marked as experimental, that was moved to no-subscriptions to make it easier to test without pulling in other updates for less...
-
gurubert reacted to proxuser77's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
Yes, but in this case it’s not really an issue at all, because even in the no-subscription repository you still have to explicitly install the new kernel. And if someone does that without fully reading the above post, that’s on them. And yes, if...
-
gurubert reacted to spirit's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
7.0 is optin and you can still boot on previous kernel in grub. And only availaible in non subscription repo. So, instead complaining, please report your nic model. Is it a pbs vm on proxmox ve ? Or on vmware ?
-
gurubert reacted to ness1602's post in the thread Proxmox (as a company) - what the HELL are you doing? Kernel update to 7 broke networking IN A VM with Like.
7.0 is a test kernel,not an enterprise kernel atm, so if you are okay with breakages you use this kernel. If not, you usually pay for enterprise subscription. Why would you be angry on a company giving you a test repo?
-
gurubert reacted to tomcat667's post in the thread What are everyone's experience with IBM SANs? with Like.
IBM dropped yesterday a new Whitepaper for a plugin integration. That is not a ready to use plugin at the moment...
-
gurubert reacted to maurin's post in the thread Proxmox VE - Ceph SMB/NFS gateways integration into Proxmox (+ UI?) with Like.
Did you tried to use ceph+ganesha manual deployment from Debian to test on proxmox ceph in your lab ? This option is Debian native and does not need to be deployed from proxmox nodes if you set ceph client + auth inside some PVE VM, from proxmox...
-
gurubert reacted to Hannes Laimer's post in the thread Support for Unicode characters in usernames with Like.
I think this is because we get ldap values already utf-8 encoded, but treat them as if they are not. sent a patch[0]. [0] https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260417110451.134766-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com/T/#u
-
Just be sure you do NOT mix other traffic along with these, most especially corosync. if you have more then 4 interfaces keep the other forms of traffic on different interfaces. If you dont- consider only using two interfaces for ceph and two...
-
they are no multipath/redudancy at ceph level, you need to do it with bonding of your network cards
-
gurubert reacted to JohnnyMegs's post in the thread [SOLVED] Issue: Unable to reach Ceph after upgrade to Squid (19.2) with Like.
The issue is something that I didn't expect and I'm willing to mark this as solved. Two of the three nodes had maxed out primary hdds (not the pool) because of a backup job. I didn't notice it until now and didn't expect something else to be...
-
gurubert reacted to Fearless-Grape5584's post in the thread Unable to Access Internet from VM with SDN VXLAN Network in Proxmox with Like.
The important point is that in a VXLAN zone, the gateway field in the subnet settings does not automatically create a real router for that network. It only defines addressing information for the subnet. It does not make Proxmox spawn a gateway...
-
gurubert reacted to shanreich's post in the thread Unable to Access Internet from VM with SDN VXLAN Network in Proxmox with Like.
VXLAN is a layer2 network and as such does not provide any routing functionality - the gateway setting has no effect. You'd need to add a second network device for connecting to the internet or add a gateway VM/CT to the VXLAN that has internet...