So I've been reading threads about fd's . [ no more floppy disks around so fd = Failover Domains 
] .
I'm setting up a 3 node cluster with two drbd resources on nodeA and nodeB per what e100 has written. nodeC is to provide proper quorum and development.
from this thread http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/8693-is-there-an-alternative-to-fencing-for-HA?p=49835#post49835 :
my questions:
Does the above totally exclude nodeC from running vmid 100 by high availability control?
I assume a lower numbered priority [ 1 ] is the primary node for vmid 100 ?
] .I'm setting up a 3 node cluster with two drbd resources on nodeA and nodeB per what e100 has written. nodeC is to provide proper quorum and development.
from this thread http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/8693-is-there-an-alternative-to-fencing-for-HA?p=49835#post49835 :
Code:
<rm>
<pvevm autostart="1" vmid="101" domain="nodeA-nodeB"/>
<failoverdomains>
<failoverdomain name="nodeA-nodeB" restricted="1" ordered="1" nofailback="1">
<failoverdomainnode name="nodeA" priority="1"/>
<failoverdomainnode name="nodeB" priority="100"/>
</failoverdomain>
</failoverdomains>
</rm>my questions:
Does the above totally exclude nodeC from running vmid 100 by high availability control?
I assume a lower numbered priority [ 1 ] is the primary node for vmid 100 ?