I am deploying a PVE cluster, and I have confronted a vlan configuation problem.
I setup the PVE cluster in 192.168.100.0/24 subnet. and I setup a physical port eth5 as a manager port with following configuration.
on nodes A:
auto vmbr203
iface vmbr203 inet manual
address 11.48.16.243
netmask 255.255.255.224
bridge ports eth5.203
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
on nodes B:
auto vmbr203
iface vmbr203 inet manual
address 11.48.16.244
netmask 255.255.255.224
bridge ports eth5.203
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
when I ping nodes A from nodes b, I got host unreachable message.
but when I use “bridge ports eth5" instead of "bridge ports eth5.203", I can ping nodes A from nodes B successfully.
anthing wrong?
I setup the PVE cluster in 192.168.100.0/24 subnet. and I setup a physical port eth5 as a manager port with following configuration.
on nodes A:
auto vmbr203
iface vmbr203 inet manual
address 11.48.16.243
netmask 255.255.255.224
bridge ports eth5.203
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
on nodes B:
auto vmbr203
iface vmbr203 inet manual
address 11.48.16.244
netmask 255.255.255.224
bridge ports eth5.203
bridge_stp off
bridge_fd 0
when I ping nodes A from nodes b, I got host unreachable message.
but when I use “bridge ports eth5" instead of "bridge ports eth5.203", I can ping nodes A from nodes B successfully.
anthing wrong?