Hello,
one of my Proxmox 3.2 boxes just crashed with the following trace.
The machine has been rebooted in the meantime, so I do unfurtnately not have more of the trace.
Any ideas what may have caused this?
Thanks
I am not sure I understand what you're trying to achieve. Maybe you can describe it a little better/more.
If you're using a bridged network setup for the VM, adding a second IP-subnet to the VM should not require any changes in the Proxmox VE host at all. See e.g...
@tom, @dietmar: Hiding feedback that is security related is a bad idea. You already have to scroll in that download box, so adding the verification process does absolutely no harm.
This may apply to me, but does not apply to the average sysadmin, which is why I am proposing this change. An...
Then please give the user feedback about what is going on. You are showing the download process, but not the signature verification. The user has no idea that the downloaded package has been verified after download and may get suspicious because of the HTTP download (just like me). Also, does...
There is no signature verification or it is not visible to the user.
starting template download from: http://download.proxmox.com/appliances/system/debian-5.0-standard_5.0-2_i386.tar.gz
target file: /var/lib/vz/template/cache/debian-5.0-standard_5.0-2_i386.tar.gz
--2013-01-14 16:44:53--...
Hello Tom,
I am sorry for complaining. It may have been a bit unfair to complain, especially considering that I basically posted on a weekend. Nevertheless it is annoying to wait 48 hours to be able to contribute posts. I don't know how many moderators you have, but maybe it's not enough. Or...
Please cryptographically sign appliance templates and other resources that can be downloaded from within the Proxmox Webinterface and verify the signature after download. Currently downloads happen via unauthenticated HTTP.
This forum isn't really usable if it takes days to get posts approved. This is my third post within 48 hours now and none of my posts have been approved so far.
What is the status here? I would like to see support for this implemented in the webinterface. Could you please link to the bug tracker ticket?
It seems to be rather easy to implement. See e.g...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.