Search results

Hi Dietmar, there are no Problems with the current simfs. But some would need the same features that we have if we use KVM. Mainly the possibillity for live migration and high availibility! Thats the main reasons to have a filesystem like ploop for OpenVZ. And Ploop will bring the possibility...

No mir, I'am not shure about the ioping results! Therefor i did more benchmarks with dd, dbench and bonnie++ I also explaned the setup in the first tests. And as mo comment that i could have used a /tmpfs within /tmp, i repeated the tests again, but this time to /home. The results are the same...

Tnx. mo for ur reply. So i did another ioping benchmark with /home: root@ovz1:/# ioping -c 10 -s 1M /home 1048576 bytes from /home (ext4 /dev/ploop35697p1): request=1 time=1.7 ms 1048576 bytes from /home (ext4 /dev/ploop35697p1): request=2 time=2.0 ms 1048576 bytes from /home (ext4...

Because i maybe fooled myself with ploop and the results of ioping, i did another Benchmark. This time i use dbench 4.0: OpenVZ/simfs, 8GB Disk, 2GB RAM (256MB Swap), Debian 6 at PVE (1) # test # dbench version 4.00 - Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1999-2004 # dbench -D /tmp 100 Operation...

Hi Tom, i did a new Test-Setup to get fair Results. So here we go: OpenVZ in KVM - Performance-Test 1. Proxmox VE 2.2 - Kernel 2.6.32-16-pve 2. CentOS 6.3 - Kernel 2.6.32-042stab072.10 Both VM's: CPU's 4 (2 Sockets, 2 Cores) 8 GB RAM 64 GB Disk (VirtIO) at HP P 2000 (SAS)...

Hi Dietmar, maybe, would it possible to get ploop within the pvetest repo? I ask for, because i did some performance tests with openvz inside a KVM. One test with centos 6.3, latest openvz repo/kernel 2.6.32-042stab072.10 with ploop, a second test with proxmox ve 2.2 and standard simfs inside...

Hi Dietmar, 3 month ahead, any news about the ploop implementation? I think everybody with fast SAN configurations hardly want this feature to get speed and HA with containers. BTW: Maybe it would be a nice idea to setup a benchmark site inside this forum, so one could compare his values with...

Hi Tom, tnx for ur advice in licensing for Nexenta CE. You are absolutely right, but it was new to me, also. OK, then we could walk with OpenIndiana and napp-IT. The Interface is not that professional, but it works perfectly, too. We also watch out your tests with Intel Modular Server. It...

Tnx charnov, i don't see any Probs with the PCI Passtrough on my ESXi 5. Neither the LSI HBA nor for the two Intel Nics. Only the VMware Tools are not working inside the Nexenta CE. But this might change with the new upcomming Version 4. They changing the underlaying OS from Nexenta Core to...

Hey Morten, tnx for ur answer. But i think i will go with ZFS as Main-Storage. Anyway, the OpenMediaVault could be a Solution for the secondary (alternative for QNAP) Backup. Greetings Udo

Hi charnov, i like your idea to use ZFS on OpenIndiana with napp-it. But i want to think a bit further: why not virtualize the ZFS Storage Software by installing ZFS/napp-it with LSI HBA's inside two nodes (HA) and connect them to one JBOD Storage? At the Moment i test this with a...