Recent content by bea

Why is not PVE-zsync integrated intro the PVE GUI? Perhaps it is somehow problematic in some way? Isn't PVE-zsync the best option when you have two PVEs in different locations and you want them to be redundant for a quick disaster recovery? On site 1 I have PVE1 and PBS1. On site 2 I have PVE2...

Hello! I have found this very interesting PVE-zsync thing, I would like to use it, but I have read IP addresses must be used to configure it. I have two PVE hosts in two different locations. I would like to sync them so that one is redundant of the other for a quick disaster recovery. They are...

I guess everything is ok now, so thank you very much @Dunuin for your excellent support!

Resilvering is done. Next command to enter gave me this result: root@pbs:~# proxmox-boot-tool format /dev/sdb2 UUID="A0DA-28DA" SIZE="536870912" FSTYPE="vfat" PARTTYPE="c12a7328-f81f-11d2-ba4b-00a0c93ec93b" PKNAME="sdb" MOUNTPOINT="" E: '/dev/sdb2' contains a filesystem ('vfat') - exiting (use...

Rebooted and problem gone! I could successfully execute the next commands, now it's resilvering after the replace. I'll post back when it's done.

Ok. I'm going to try the proposed commands. First, this is where I am: :~# zpool status pool: rpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a...

And I did run proxmox-boot-tool clean after the replace.

I did not. I am checking the instructions now and noticing I did not run proxmox-boot-tool format or init in any way.

:~# blkid /dev/sda3: LABEL="rpool" UUID="9956866810370661066" UUID_SUB="12835679230063345824" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="zfs_member" PARTUUID="0c3e20c8-5d00-4cad-a276-ff80d10e68bf" /dev/sdb2: UUID="A0DA-28DA" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat" PARTUUID="57ac766f-36cb-4912-a985-5f53d951009c" /dev/sdb3...

:~# lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 1.9T 0 disk |-sda1 8:1 0 1007K 0 part |-sda2 8:2 0 512M 0 part `-sda3 8:3 0 1.8T 0 part sdb 8:16 0 1.8T 0 disk |-sdb1 8:17 0 1007K 0 part |-sdb2 8:18 0 512M 0 part `-sdb3 8:19 0...

:~# ls -la /dev/disk/by-id total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 360 Dec 7 14:02 . drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 140 Dec 7 14:02 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Dec 7 14:02 ata-MT-2TB_0013603004006 -> ../../sda lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Dec 7 14:02 ata-MT-2TB_0013603004006-part1 -> ../../sda1 lrwxrwxrwx 1...

Thank you for your help. ## fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 1.86 TiB, 2048408248320 bytes, 4000797360 sectors Disk model: MT-2TB Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: gpt Disk...

I replaced the disk, did the two `sgdisk` commands and had to do: zpool replace -f <pool> <old zfs partition> <new zfs partition> So, as I had replaced the non-working disk, then physically In the system I only had two disks: the old working (ONLINE) device and the new empty device, so I...

But, If I had done so, I guess I would not see the system keeps working perfectly, would I? And I guess I would not see one device shown as online, would I?

Thank you very much. I replaced the disk and then followed the mentioned instructions on the documentation without an issue, but please see in the attached picture what I get now. What shall I do? Thank you!