Latest activity
-
MMadscientist replied to the thread 8.4 to 9.2 upgrade.i have 8 - 10g nic and 2 - 1 g nic, with a lot of vlan configured, ceph, cluster trafiic are segrigated, open vSwitch is configured on 8 out of 10 nic, i tried to use "pinned your NIC names" and find it very difficult and complicated to...
-
FFreedbot posted the thread [TUTORIAL] OpenWRT LXC "Forbidden Router" in Proxmox VE: Installation and configuration.Purpose Inspired by Level1Techs, I decided to replace my old router with a single box solution that's flexible, upgradable, and efficient. That includes using Proxmox to utilize spare resources without interfering with the vital router...
-
RResidentDataHoarder replied to the thread CEPH OSD(s) failing to initialize after a hardware change.That's a really good Idea, I didn't think to do that! I just got back from an errand, I'll try that now!
-
TTErxleben replied to the thread Gibt es mit PVE 2.x ggf. Änderungen bei der RAM-Nutzung, bzw. deren Anzeige bei VMs?.Ich habe nun, dank dieses Gedankenaustauschs, gedanklich abgelegt, dass ein VM-Kernel v4, durchaus problembehaftet (funktionell?) in Verbindung mit einer qemu-Version unter einem Host-Kernel v7 ist. Wäre unerwartet und ätzend, da die Kapselung in...
-
Mmaxim.webster reacted to JD-iteee's post in the thread Making best use of multiple NICs per Node with
Like.
Hi Maxim, with 4x 2.5GbE per node and your setup using Corosync, HA and ZFS replication without Ceph, I would separate the traffic types as much as possible to keep the cluster stable and easier to troubleshoot. I would use one dedicated NIC... -
TTErxleben replied to the thread Gibt es mit PVE 2.x ggf. Änderungen bei der RAM-Nutzung, bzw. deren Anzeige bei VMs?.Sollte auch nie Kritik sein. Freut mich sogar, wenn du dir die Mühe machst, solchen Nickligkeiten auf den Grund zu gehen. Wie du erwähnst hast, verfüge ich auch über viel Spieltrieb:) Darum meine Frage, ob sich das Anhalten der DMS-VM bis auf...
-
NYes. From our side no actual blockers for server/enterprise HW. Yes. If the server enterprise hardware on the horizon materializes: quite positive.
-
LLeopold31 replied to the thread PBS failure with kernel 7.0.I was referring to this report: https://www.linuxcompatible.org/story/linux-kernel-7010-released/ I have a heavy schedule the next few days so I don't see that I'll have time to get to more testing in right away. I'll see if I can get more...
-
Aabufrejoval replied to the thread Proxmox VE arm64.Yes, that's what started as a fork by Jiangcuo and could easily take over the Proxmox niche, sooner or later... It's probably a good thing they aren't targeting x86 at the moment, but concentrating on "Chinese" home-grown CPU varieties, perhaps...
-
SWEETGOOD replied to the thread Allow migration and replication of disks on ZFS encrypted storage.Thanks for pointing that out. I'm already monitoring the situation in my setup since using the upstream "fix" and did not recognize anything which I would call "significant". So can you specify what you meant with "significant speed disadvantage"? -
jebbam replied to the thread Cluster not quorate - extending auth key lifetime!.Awesome, that order did the trick. All looks good. I did the same for nh5 too, so they are all up. Thanks 100x for all your help! Do you know why this may have happened? I've rebooted Proxmox nodes many times, including entire clusters that were... -
SWEETGOOD reacted to jjakob's post in the thread Allow migration and replication of disks on ZFS encrypted storage with Like.
I don't think so. The patch by selbitschka works very differently than the "fix" that Stoiko Ivanov authored and was commtted in pve-storage.git. The -w option enables raw sends, which sends the entire dataset as-is, it does not decrypt it, nor...
-
Ddea replied to the thread Problem on LTO-9 with kernel 7.0.x.I had tried via the GUI, simply to list the available tapes, and no tapes were detected (with the 7.0.x kernel). After reverting to 6.17, everything started working perfectly again. From what I’ve read in various articles, it seems that the 7.0.x...
-
AI use PXVIRT from the chinese fork on a Raspberry PI 5 with 16GB on Raspbery PI OS Trixie. If you use Trixie you get PXVIRT 9.0.10-2 at the moment. While using Bookworm you get only PXVIRT 8.x.
-
jebbam reacted to fabian's post in the thread Cluster not quorate - extending auth key lifetime! with Like.
that looks good so far, the question mark is probably because pvestatd is not running yet on that node. could you try starting it and see if it goes "green" then? if it does, you can start the other services as well on that node. please then try...
-
Ggarfield2008 replied to the thread Hardwarer oder Software RAID.Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere ist der IT Mode vom P440AR im DL360/DL380 Gen9 nicht bootfähig so das man für ZFS noch ein SATA Boot device benötigt.
-
Sstaypo replied to the thread Verifcation and Restore is failing.I setup the PBS as a VM with the official repos and I have the exact same behaviour
-
OOhmEye replied to the thread After PVE 8to9 upgrade, unable to check guest fs freeze status.Looks like it's consistent with the error when run manually: root@redacted:~# qm guest cmd 101 fsfreeze-status { "error" : { "class" : "CommandNotFound", "desc" : "The command guest-fsfreeze-status has been disabled for this...
-
RolandK replied to the thread building pve kernel fails with make[2]: *** [debian/rules:281: abicheck] Fehler 1.yes, i started from clean state and git status showed nothing special . also with exact these command, i get the same error/problem. could you (or someone else who is able to compile successfulle) perhaps post his package list, so i can sure... -
Ccelemine1gig replied to the thread Failure to boot.Manually boot to a UEFI shell and boot from their, if possible. You can get prebuilt shells online (e.g. here: https://github.com/pbatard/UEFI-Shell/releases ). And then you just need a medium and put the shell-binary on it, inside the directory...